drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From rahul challapalli <challapallira...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Drill 1.3.0 (rc2)
Date Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:48:38 GMT
While breaking backward compatibility could be justified in cases like
this, doing this without providing a tested upgrade process is unacceptable.

- Rahul

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Steven Phillips <steven@dremio.com> wrote:

> Does DRILL-4070 cause incorrect results? Or just prevent partition pruning?
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Jason Altekruse <
> altekrusejason@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I just commented on the JIRA, we are behaving correctly for newly created
> > parquet files. I did confirm the failure to prune on auto-partitioned
> files
> > created by 1.2. I do not think this is a release blocker, because I do
> not
> > think we can solve this in Drill code without risking wrong results over
> > parquet files written by other tools. I do support the creation of a
> > migration utility for existing files written by Drill 1.2, but this can
> be
> > released independent of 1.3.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Jinfeng Ni <jinfengni99@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Agree with Aman that DRILL-4070 is a show stopper. Parquet is the
> > > major data source Drill uses. If this release candidate breaks the
> > > backward compatibility of partitioning pruning for the parquet files
> > > created with prior release of Drill, it could cause serious problem
> > > for the current Drill user.
> > >
> > > -1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:10 AM, rahul challapalli
> > > <challapallirahul@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > -1 (non-binding)
> > > > The nature of the issue (DRILL-4070) demands adequate testing even
> > with a
> > > > workaround in place.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Aman Sinha <amansinha@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Given this issue, I would be a -1  unfortunately.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Aman Sinha <amansinha@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Can someone familiar with the parquet changes take a look at
> > > DRILL-4070 ?
> > > >> > It seems to break backward compatibility.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> jacques@dremio.com
> > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Hey Everybody,
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> I'd like to propose a new release candidate of Apache Drill,
> > version
> > > >> >> 1.3.0.  This is the third release candidate (rc2).  This
> addresses
> > > some
> > > >> >> issues identified in the the second release candidate including
> > some
> > > >> test
> > > >> >> issues & rpc concurrency issues.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> The tarball artifacts are hosted at [2] and the maven artifacts
> are
> > > >> hosted
> > > >> >> at [3]. This release candidate is based on commit
> > > >> >> 13ab6b1f9897ebcf9179407ffaf84b79b0ee95a1 located at [4].
> > > >> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours ending at 10PM Pacific,
> November
> > > 13,
> > > >> >> 2015.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> [ ] +1
> > > >> >> [ ] +0
> > > >> >> [ ] -1
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> thanks,
> > > >> >> Jacques
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> [1]
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313820&version=12332946
> > > >> >> [2]http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.3.0.rc2/
> > > >> >> [3]
> > > >> >>
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedrill-1013/
> > > >> >> [4] https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/drill-1.3.0
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> --
> > > >> >> Jacques Nadeau
> > > >> >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message