drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Temporary branches
Date Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:41:41 GMT
There’s no other thread, since David Nalley’s email was sent to a Bcc: list, but I’ve
sent him an email and copied you (Jacques) on it.

> On Nov 5, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com> wrote:
> 
> I think the temporary- concept seems like a simple solution. You want to
> propose on that other thread so I can +1?
> 
> --
> Jacques Nadeau
> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> 
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure what to do here. INFRA just changed the Git behavior so it
>> is
>>> no longer possible to delete branches. I generally don't like to have
>>> failed branches in a release history (otherwise you get a release branch
>>> with all these maven forward/backwards commits). As such, I would
>> overwrite
>>> candidate branches historically (dropping the failed release commits).
>> 
>> (Moving to a new thread to as not to hijack the VOTE thread.)
>> 
>> I am wresting with the same problem with Calcite. I wonder whether we
>> should ask INFRA to treat branches called ‘temporary-…’ differently.
>> 
>> Julian
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message