drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Westin <chriswesti...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Timing for 1.2 release, ideas around things to include
Date Fri, 02 Oct 2015 20:39:27 GMT
Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3874 , which is ready to
merge (https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/181).

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Abdel Hakim Deneche <adeneche@maprtech.com>
wrote:

> DRILL-1065 and 3884 have been merged to master. Remaining issues for 1.2:
>
> DRILL-2879 Add Remaining portion of "Drill extended json's support $oid"
> DRILL-3887 Parquet metadata cache not being used (regression caused by
> DRILL-3788)
> DRILL-2361 Column aliases cannot include dots
>
> Any idea when those patches will be merged into master ?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Aman Sinha <asinha@maprtech.com> wrote:
>
> > If no one has objections, I would like to merge Adam's patch for
> DRILL-2361
> > (Column aliases cannot include dots).  This has been reviewed and tested.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Abdel Hakim Deneche <
> adeneche@maprtech.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > DRILL-1065 is ready to be merged, I'm running the final unit tests
> right
> > > now.
> > >
> > > How about we set the cutoff to tomorrow 5pm pacific time ? any patch
> that
> > > isn't in master by then won't be part of 1.2 ?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > We went through the list. I propose that we include only the
> following
> > > > issues in 1.2 and move the rest to 1.3
> > > >
> > > > DRILL-1065 Provide a reset command to reset an option to its default
> > > value
> > > > DRILL-3884 Hive native scan has lower parallelization leading to
> > > > performance degradation
> > > > DRILL-2879 Add Remaining portion of "Drill extended json's support
> > $oid"
> > > > DRILL-3887 Parquet metadata cache not being used (regression caused
> by
> > > > DRILL-3788)
> > > >
> > > > What do other people think?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jacques Nadeau
> > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm on:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/event/ci4rdiju8bv04a64efj5fedd0lc
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jacques Nadeau
> > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> How about now?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Jacques Nadeau
> > > > >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Parth Chandra <parthc@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> What time do you want the hangout? I'm in favour of bumping
if we
> > > > cannot
> > > > >>> get decided by tomorrow.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> jacques@dremio.com
> > >
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Abdel Hakim Deneche
<
> > > > >>> > adeneche@maprtech.com>
> > > > >>> >  wrote:
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > > I can manage the release.
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > Great! I use a manual variation of these steps [1] typically.
> > > Julian
> > > > >>> Hyde
> > > > >>> > made a much nicer set of steps (for Incubator) here:
[2] if you
> > > want
> > > > >>> to use
> > > > >>> > those.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Parth Chandra <
> parthc@apache.org
> > >
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > > +1 on the release. I'm all for starting the process
ASAP.
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > I've moved all the non-critical, non-active jiras out
of 1.2.
> > > > However,
> > > > >>> that
> > > > >>> > still leaves 63 issues open. Do you want to do a quick
hangout
> to
> > > try
> > > > >>> to
> > > > >>> > figure what we really want to include versus bump?
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > J
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > [1]
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gist.github.com/jacques-n/be0d2f584171d832aedb#file-release_commands
> > > > >>> > [2]
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/howto.html#making-a-release-for-calcite-committers
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Abdel Hakim Deneche
<
> > > > >>> > adeneche@maprtech.com
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > wrote:
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > > I can manage the release.
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Aman Sinha
<
> > > asinha@maprtech.com
> > > > >
> > > > >>> > wrote:
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > +1 for starting the process of finalizing
the 1.2 release
> > and
> > > > >>> 'bounce
> > > > >>> > > > > everything not critical (and not in-progress
or
> reviewable)
> > > off
> > > > >>> of
> > > > >>> > this
> > > > >>> > > > > release'.
> > > > >>> > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > Aman
> > > > >>> > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Jacques
Nadeau <
> > > > >>> jacques@dremio.com>
> > > > >>> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >>> > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > Hey All,
> > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > It seems like we should finalize
on the 1.2 release
> > pretty
> > > > >>> soon. I
> > > > >>> > > > > > currently see something like 174
bugs currently open.
> Of
> > > > >>> those, ~20
> > > > >>> > > are
> > > > >>> > > > > > reviewable and ~20 are in progress.
I'm inclined to
> > bounce
> > > > >>> > everything
> > > > >>> > > > not
> > > > >>> > > > > > critical (and not in-progress or
reviewable) off of
> this
> > > > >>> release.
> > > > >>> > Any
> > > > >>> > > > > > thoughts on when everyone would
like to do a release?
> > Also,
> > > > >>> anyone
> > > > >>> > > want
> > > > >>> > > > > to
> > > > >>> > > > > > be release manager?
> > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > Jacques
> > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > --
> > > > >>> > > > > > Jacques Nadeau
> > > > >>> > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:58 PM,
Parth Chandra <
> > > > >>> parthc@apache.org>
> > > > >>> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > A couple of reasons -
> > > > >>> > > > > > >   a) We definitely need more
QA time for the features
> > > that
> > > > >>> are
> > > > >>> > > ready.
> > > > >>> > > > > > >   b) Some features, in particular,
Parquet metadata
> > > caching
> > > > >>> > > (Steven)
> > > > >>> > > > > and
> > > > >>> > > > > > > Faster Hive reads (Jason) are
close enough to
> > completion
> > > > >>> that we
> > > > >>> > > > really
> > > > >>> > > > > > > should include them. Again
the team could use the
> extra
> > > > time
> > > > >>> to
> > > > >>> > QA
> > > > >>> > > > > these.
> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:32
PM, Chris Westin <
> > > > >>> > > > chriswestin42@gmail.com
> > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Unfortunately, we've had
to modify our plans, and
> are
> > > now
> > > > >>> > > thinking
> > > > >>> > > > of
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > aiming for a vote on September
10th.
> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at
1:29 PM, Chris Westin <
> > > > >>> > > > > chriswestin42@gmail.com
> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > We were thinking
of targetting for a vote on
> August
> > > > 26th.
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015
at 1:19 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> > > > >>> > > > > jacques@dremio.com>
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Following up
since we haven't discussed the 1.2
> > > > release
> > > > >>> in a
> > > > >>> > > > > while.
> > > > >>> > > > > > > How
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> are people feeling
about trying to get a
> candidate
> > > out
> > > > >>> in
> > > > >>> > the
> > > > >>> > > > next
> > > > >>> > > > > > > week
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > or
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> two?
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> thanks,
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Jacques
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Jacques Nadeau
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> CTO and Co-Founder,
Dremio
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > ----------
Forwarded message ----------
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > From: Parth
Chandra <pchandra@maprtech.com>
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Date: Thu,
Jul 9, 2015 at 11:29 AM
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Subject:
Re: Timing for 1.2 release, ideas
> > around
> > > > >>> things
> > > > >>> > to
> > > > >>> > > > > > include
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > To: dev@drill.apache.org
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I just moved
DRILL-3201 to 1.2. It's one of
> the
> > > > >>> candidates
> > > > >>> > > for
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > inclusion
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > into 1.2
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > On Thu,
Jul 9, 2015 at 7:04 AM, <
> > > > >>> > michael.england@nomura.com
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > I'm
not sure what the appetite is for
> pushing
> > > this
> > > > >>> into
> > > > >>> > > 1.2
> > > > >>> > > > vs
> > > > >>> > > > > > the
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > planned
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > 1.3,
but Drill UI Authentication would be
> > really
> > > > >>> great
> > > > >>> > for
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > companies/users
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > that
run multi-tenant Hadoop clusters with
> > > Drill.
> > > > >>> At the
> > > > >>> > > > > moment
> > > > >>> > > > > > > any
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> user
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > can
change storage plugins and cancel
> running
> > > > >>> queries,
> > > > >>> > > even
> > > > >>> > > > if
> > > > >>> > > > > > > they
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> did
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > not
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > submit
them. This is a bit of a blocker for
> > > Drill
> > > > on
> > > > >>> > > > > > multi-tenant
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > production
clusters for now.
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > JIRA
link:
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3201
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > -----Original
Message-----
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > From:
Jacques Nadeau [mailto:
> > jacques@apache.org
> > > ]
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Sent:
08 July 2015 17:19
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > To:
dev@drill.apache.org
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Subject:
Timing for 1.2 release, ideas
> around
> > > > >>> things to
> > > > >>> > > > > include
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Hey
Guys,
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > What
do you think about planning the 1.2
> > feature
> > > > >>> cutoff
> > > > >>> > > > around
> > > > >>> > > > > > Aug
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> 21st
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > and
target a release vote a week or so after
> > > that?
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > What
are different features people want to
> get
> > > > into
> > > > >>> 1.2?
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Here
are couple of things that I'd like to
> > help
> > > > >>> > facilitate
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> contribution
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > and/or
inclusion:
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > - Mongo
improvements (including extended
> type
> > > > fixes
> > > > >>> > 2879 ,
> > > > >>> > > > > test
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > cases
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > 1666,
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > etc)
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > - httpd
log parser format plugin (3423)
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > - rpc
enhancements (local 2941 and
> off-thread
> > > > 3242)
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > - First
merge of Magnus' JDBC connector
> (3180)
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > - New
allocator (1942)
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Other
key goals?  What do people think about
> > the
> > > > >>> > proposed
> > > > >>> > > > > > timing?
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > This
e-mail (including any attachments) is
> > > private
> > > > >>> and
> > > > >>> > > > > > > confidential,
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> may
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > contain
proprietary or privileged
> information
> > > and
> > > > is
> > > > >>> > > > intended
> > > > >>> > > > > > for
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > the
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > named
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > recipient(s)
only. Unintended recipients are
> > > > >>> strictly
> > > > >>> > > > > prohibited
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > from
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > taking
action on the basis of information in
> > > this
> > > > >>> e-mail
> > > > >>> > > and
> > > > >>> > > > > > must
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> contact
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > the
sender immediately, delete this e-mail
> > (and
> > > > all
> > > > >>> > > > > attachments)
> > > > >>> > > > > > > and
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > destroy
any hard copies. Nomura will not
> > accept
> > > > >>> > > > responsibility
> > > > >>> > > > > > or
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > liability
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > for
the accuracy or completeness of, or the
> > > > >>> presence of
> > > > >>> > > any
> > > > >>> > > > > > virus
> > > > >>> > > > > > > or
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > disabling
code in, this e-mail. If
> > verification
> > > is
> > > > >>> > sought
> > > > >>> > > > > please
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> request
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > a
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > hard
copy. Any reference to the terms of
> > > executed
> > > > >>> > > > transactions
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > should
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> be
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > treated
as preliminary only and subject to
> > > formal
> > > > >>> > written
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> confirmation
by
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Nomura.
Nomura reserves the right to retain,
> > > > >>> monitor and
> > > > >>> > > > > > intercept
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> e-mail
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > communications
through its networks (subject
> > to
> > > > and
> > > > >>> in
> > > > >>> > > > > > accordance
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > with
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > applicable
laws). No confidentiality or
> > > privilege
> > > > is
> > > > >>> > > waived
> > > > >>> > > > or
> > > > >>> > > > > > > lost
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > by
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Nomura
by any mistransmission of this
> e-mail.
> > > Any
> > > > >>> > > reference
> > > > >>> > > > to
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> "Nomura"
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > is
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > a reference
to any entity in the Nomura
> > > Holdings,
> > > > >>> Inc.
> > > > >>> > > > group.
> > > > >>> > > > > > > Please
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> read
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > our
Electronic Communications Legal Notice
> > which
> > > > >>> forms
> > > > >>> > > part
> > > > >>> > > > of
> > > > >>> > > > > > > this
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > e-mail:
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > http://www.Nomura.com/email_disclaimer.htm
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > >
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > --
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > Abdelhakim Deneche
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > Software Engineer
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > >   <http://www.mapr.com/>
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training
> > > > >>> > > > <
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available
> > > > >>> > > > >
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Abdelhakim Deneche
> > >
> > > Software Engineer
> > >
> > >   <http://www.mapr.com/>
> > >
> > >
> > > Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training
> > > <
> > >
> >
> http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Abdelhakim Deneche
>
> Software Engineer
>
>   <http://www.mapr.com/>
>
>
> Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training
> <
> http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message