drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Fixing the test process
Date Sun, 30 Aug 2015 22:03:34 GMT
In particular, can you say which version you are testing, which java and
what test is failing?

Putting the test output somewhere accessible would be a huge help.



On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com> wrote:

> >Does anyone have a patch for the current test problem, so I could address
> >that in the meantime?
>
> We're not sure what you are talking about. Can you expound?
>
>
>
> --
> Jacques Nadeau
> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Edmon Begoli <ebegoli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My build without tests is doing fine. No problems there.
> >
> > I will wait for Andrew to break the unit testing up.
> >
> > Does anyone have a patch for the current test problem, so I could address
> > that in the meantime?
> >
> > On Sunday, August 30, 2015, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew is actively working on breaking up the tests. Hopefully he'll
> have
> > > something to report soon.
> > >
> > > On the build problem, please share more details.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jacques Nadeau
> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Edmon Begoli <ebegoli@gmail.com
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This might be already in motion, but let me discuss it with you
> > > > > nevertheless:
> > > > >
> > > > > - could we break up the testing configuration so that small, atomic
> > > unit
> > > > > tests can be always ran by default
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Specific tests can already be run separately.
> > > >
> > > > There is no wholesale separation into small and large tests
> > currently.  I
> > > > think that there is an effort underway to do something quite similar
> to
> > > > that.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - create larger configurations for complex unit and integration
> > testing
> > > > so
> > > > > we can run them independently, if needed
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > As above.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Finally, can someone point me at that patch that fixes current test
> > > > problem
> > > > > locally.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Which version of Java do you have?  There is a known problem with a
> few
> > > > tests on Java 8.
> > > >
> > > > What precise problem are you seeing?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > It would make me more comfortable being able to run full builds
> with
> > > > tests.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Indeed.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message