drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edmon Begoli <ebeg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Fixing the test process
Date Sun, 30 Aug 2015 21:32:13 GMT
My build without tests is doing fine. No problems there.

I will wait for Andrew to break the unit testing up.

Does anyone have a patch for the current test problem, so I could address
that in the meantime?

On Sunday, August 30, 2015, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@dremio.com> wrote:

> Andrew is actively working on breaking up the tests. Hopefully he'll have
> something to report soon.
>
> On the build problem, please share more details.
>
> --
> Jacques Nadeau
> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Edmon Begoli <ebegoli@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > This might be already in motion, but let me discuss it with you
> > > nevertheless:
> > >
> > > - could we break up the testing configuration so that small, atomic
> unit
> > > tests can be always ran by default
> > >
> >
> > Specific tests can already be run separately.
> >
> > There is no wholesale separation into small and large tests currently.  I
> > think that there is an effort underway to do something quite similar to
> > that.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > - create larger configurations for complex unit and integration testing
> > so
> > > we can run them independently, if needed
> > >
> >
> > As above.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Finally, can someone point me at that patch that fixes current test
> > problem
> > > locally.
> > >
> >
> > Which version of Java do you have?  There is a known problem with a few
> > tests on Java 8.
> >
> > What precise problem are you seeing?
> >
> >
> >
> > > It would make me more comfortable being able to run full builds with
> > tests.
> > >
> >
> > Indeed.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message