Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F9E7189E0 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97958 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2015 15:05:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@drill.apache.org Received: (qmail 97910 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2015 15:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@drill.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@drill.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@drill.apache.org Received: (qmail 97896 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2015 15:05:11 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:05:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 171071817AA for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:05:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=maprtech.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cdbrIw-87zgb for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com [209.85.220.47]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 6CF2D47BD6 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by paceq1 with SMTP id eq1so24388466pac.3 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:04:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=maprtech.com; s=google; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=FhEvAKuuwSTXWkbc8V51iEcWKg4b/MhFRmeNxFjKqn4=; b=Q8xO/8okAq/Pa8AZqfPMn2JNBeLsJdp74ktZtnikJ672OaGF6mnys6g0SvE5u3R6dT 8dm6UgzPKCs6qnM7DVQtSZ0qRCYXhYaeQioXIZ8m5ai3XTyBb5KSFwRHz4mV8/9PlLoN yKRQP3ItwmDvHaZol3Yr0kndktqJ7xnOZyI7k= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=FhEvAKuuwSTXWkbc8V51iEcWKg4b/MhFRmeNxFjKqn4=; b=ei3m/C+jDxkYx9gHppOVlfJ93398T5Pb5XoNGjeOsx+Vx738QE5YKnSq/ZoV5Cqt60 mEiAzevacOZXK4YzgVeDpuPpCiJowmPXg/hnPGALiLY61uAtorgQbuTE8lTPGCmcwnz3 rMR0cC8ntBb2Ro2kRbJ3XDmuqU0aKTnmegQhDJfdpN16+62w6p0m+VtqrqiNDCk7QOhU ++KLS1dLsvEl7f/opfgLXUWMBSSdFHntdatgdP3SkJrkpGqJq2qAaWh/LNSRHzmPpkKk ireakTW4Z/Bsj5d+Ac9cJfHtKW3CtrGTR/MTYq2qJs/zh/jAK6/JUDIuoJ3tS98aUWvc Q+Vw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk8AcDwU171Zrfxf+6X1C9pk7m7HyO7r++2ZU6GD03RlY/bJVil3cM70S/wVR7wv6b87L2L X-Received: by 10.70.130.3 with SMTP id oa3mr56017521pdb.51.1435763047433; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:04:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.198] (162-233-206-185.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [162.233.206.185]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y2sm2589758pdi.80.2015.07.01.08.04.04 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:04:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudheesh Katkam Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Time for a 1.1 vote soon? Message-Id: Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 08:04:01 -0700 References: <086C2800-983A-4A94-B7AD-6344684E22D7@maprtech.com> In-Reply-To: To: "dev@drill.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12F70) I build using "mvn clean install -DforkCount=3D2" > On Jul 1, 2015, at 7:17 AM, Jacques Nadeau wrote: >=20 > Are people running with standard settings or custom settings? With clean > first or without? >=20 > I keep running and keep getting failures. I'll reboot and see if that > helps. >=20 > My last run (mvn clean; mvn install -DskipTests; mvn surefire:test): >=20 > Tests in error: > TestMergingReceiver.testMultipleProvidersMixedSizes:98 =C2=BB test timed= out > after... > TestParquetWriter.testLargeFooter:93->BaseTestQuery.test:309 =C2=BB test= > timed out... > TestSpoolingBuffer.testMultipleExchangesSingleThread:50 =C2=BB test time= d out > afte... >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Jinfeng Ni wrot= e: >>=20 >> I just had a clean run on my Mac with the latest master branch. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Sudheesh Katkam >> wrote: >>=20 >>> I had a clean run on my Mac with the latest master this afternoon (and >>> there are no new commits since then). >>>=20 >>>>> On Jun 30, 2015, at 9:52 PM, Steven Phillips >>>> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> I just had a clean run on my Linux machine. >>>>=20 >>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Parth Chandra >>>> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> I just completed a clean build and test run ( mvn clean install) on >> my >>>>> Mac. >>>>> Will try on Linux. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Jacques Nadeau >>>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> I ran twice more. So here are my three results: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> 1. Errors from previous email. >>>>>> 2. Tests hung indefinitely (mvn clean install). >>>>>> 3. I had one test failure, (mvn clean; mvn install), >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Tests in error: >>>>>> TestSpoolingBuffer.testMultipleExchangesSingleThread:50 =C2=BB test >> timed >>>>> out >>>>>> afte... >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Is anybody having consistent completions all the way through to the >>>>>> distribution module? >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Aman Sinha >>> wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I re-ran on my mac and don't see the failures your are seeing. I >> got >>>>> one >>>>>>> error below related to zookeeper but I believe this is intermittent.= >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> $mvn install >>>>>>> .... >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Tests in error: >>>>>>> TestPStoreProviders.verifyZkStore:55 =C2=BB Runtime Failure while >>>>> accessing >>>>>>> Zookeep... >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Tests run: 1310, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 114 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> $ java -version >>>>>>> java version "1.7.0_45" >>>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_45-b18) >>>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.45-b08, mixed mode) >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Jacques Nadeau >>=20 >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> I'm seeing failures running the build on master on a mac: >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> $ java -version >>>>>>>> java version "1.7.0_80" >>>>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_80-b15) >>>>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.80-b11, mixed mode) >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> $mvn install >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Failed tests: >>>>>>>> TestDrillbitResilience.memoryLeaksWhenCancelled:890 We are leaking >>>>>> 1812 >>>>>>>> bytes expected:<0> but was:<1812> >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Tests in error: >>> TestMergingReceiver.twoBitTwoExchange:84->Object.wait:503->Object.wait:-= 2 >>>>>>>> =C2=BB t... >>>>>>>> TestMergingReceiver.testMultipleProvidersMixedSizes:98 =C2=BB test= >>>>> timed >>>>>>> out >>>>>>>> after... >>>>>>>> TestSpoolingBuffer.testMultipleExchangesSingleThread:50 =C2=BB tes= t >>>>> timed >>>>>>> out >>>>>>>> afte... >>>>>>>> TestJoinNullable.testMergeLOJNullableOneOrderedInputDescNullsLast >> =C2=BB >>>>>>>> UserRemote >> TestUnionAll.testFilterPushDownOverUnionAll:545->BaseTestQuery.testSqlWit= hResults:265->BaseTestQuery.testRunAndReturn:278 >>>>>>>> =C2=BB >>>>>>>> TestUnionAll>BaseTestQuery.closeClient:233 =C2=BB IllegalState >> Attempted >>>>>> to >>>>>>>> close a... >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Jacques Nadeau < >> jacques@apache.org> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> Agreed. I'll spin a release. >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Parth Chandra < >> parthc@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Looks like 1.1 is looking fairly good with about 119 issues >>>>>> fixed. I >>>>>>>>>> would recommend we start the release process for 1.1. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Parth >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Jacques Nadeau < >>>>> jacques@apache.org >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Hey Guys, >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Looks like a number things are being wrapped up so it is >>>>> probably >>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>> time for a 1.1 release. Shall we branch in the next day or two >>>>> and >>>>>>> put >>>>>>>>>> 1.1 >>>>>>>>>>> to a vote? >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> -- >>>> Steven Phillips >>>> Software Engineer >>>>=20 >>>> mapr.com >>=20