drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Allow Java 1.8
Date Thu, 09 Jul 2015 02:36:05 GMT
Agreed. 7 and 8.

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:35 PM, David Tucker <dtucker@maprtech.com> wrote:

> I assume that “move to Java 1.8” implies “support Java 1.8 as well as Java
> 1.7”, not “support Java 1.8 and exclude Java 1.7”.
>
> Regards,
>   David
>
> > On Jul 8, 2015, at 7:17 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think there is a good reason.  I think the main issue was (at
> some
> > point) the tests weren't working with Java 8.  Do you want to try to run
> > the complete test suite and see if we have outstanding issues to move to
> > Java 8?
> >
> > Aditya might remember more...
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:41 PM, andrew <andrew@primer.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Is there a reason we have an enforcement on Java versions as defined in
> >> the top-level pom.xml: [1.7, 1.8)? The code compiles for me just fine
> >> w/1.8. Is this merely
> >> historical residue that can be relaxed or is there some deeper reason
> why
> >> Drill won’t/can’t work with 1.8?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Andrew
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message