Mailing-List: contact dev-help@drill.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@drill.apache.org
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:56:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Jason Altekruse (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@drill.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12772507.1423087206000.28631.1435341365997@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12772507.1423087206000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12772507.1423087206000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12772507.1423087206842@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (DRILL-2167) Order by on a repeated index from
 the output of a flatten on large no of records results in incorrect results
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jason Altekruse resolved DRILL-2167.
------------------------------------
       Resolution: Duplicate
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.1.0)

> Order by on a repeated index from the output of a flatten on large no of records results in incorrect results
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-2167
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2167
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Execution - Relational Operators
>            Reporter: Rahul Challapalli
>            Assignee: Jason Altekruse
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: data.json
>
>
> git.commit.id.abbrev=3e33880
> The below query results in 200006 records. Based on the data set we should only receive 200000 records. 
> {code}
> select s.uid from (select d.uid, flatten(d.map.rm) rms from `data.json` d) s order by s.rms.rptd[1].d;
> {code}
> When I removed the order by part, drill correctly reported 200000 records.
> {code}
> select s.uid from (select d.uid, flatten(d.map.rm) rms from `data.json` d) s;
> {code}
> I attached the data set with 2 records. I copied over the data set 50000 times and ran the queries on top of it. Let me know if you have any other questions


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)