Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6F0C17314 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 03:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51718 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2015 03:28:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-drill-dev-archive@drill.apache.org Received: (qmail 51654 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2015 03:28:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@drill.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@drill.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@drill.apache.org Received: (qmail 51637 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2015 03:28:42 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 03:28:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 83447CF91B for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 03:28:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.898 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.898 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kiKlkmEs_F59 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 03:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com (mail-ie0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CFC324C0CE for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 03:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iebrt9 with SMTP id rt9so3204416ieb.2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:27:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=IBIbs3oz2/KACdLCBtqx6ccqgnJ+HPT/P+OARjORj14=; b=Q7Hk6IqVsnEDaqMZCGwZv0DbnyBaX2CRcWONDSPNFUvU80CXaPa223a9glwGORLmlW ZdjQrxgwQuxFE5usQ/zbsEvhw8rno/8LRrRjrL8dyhqDgFSXDsoLzFy0FFrJKkF/GSxl M/NJCpMD8R6P5JFxwX0N7m1mfzdkuBMadtc4Xad7+d3LJbRDqGbyvt3j7d82VXHi1ADc 2q7E9M/sclCfelJzPuCsJ8Uy9/3wlhuHf+EJzFAbNpIc8xaCR4ROlvgdoefqn18woUbl GM5lhQLHqYPIlVgU8TA2zglGug4Wt1rD/79AOcQTFG3oKnrr7huV+g1cnwQ5JmfIZ+rq JwKQ== X-Received: by 10.50.64.243 with SMTP id r19mr25277817igs.5.1435030068445; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:27:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.176.210 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:27:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:27:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Allowing the option to use github pull requests in place of reviewboard To: "dev@drill.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc9d8878d2fc051926f985 --047d7bdc9d8878d2fc051926f985 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Jacques Nadeau wrote: > In general, I find the review interface of > GitHub less expressive/clear but everything else is way better. > The trade-off is that more people can figure out how to put PR's up for review than who can run reviewboard accurately. --047d7bdc9d8878d2fc051926f985--