drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Isn't it about time for a 0.9.0?
Date Sat, 18 Apr 2015 23:54:16 GMT
>> Let me know if you need my help in that part.

Yes, I would love your help

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Aditya <adityakishore@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1.
>
> We should also start publishing the Drill jars as maven artifacts from this
> release. I have created an infra ticket to start the process.
>
> Let me know if you need my help in that part.
>
> aditya...
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Julian Hyde <julianhyde@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Let me know if I can help with the Calcite task.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > > On Apr 16, 2015, at 18:23, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey Guys,
> > >
> > > It looks like it is about time to start prepping for a 0.9 release.  I
> > > think we need to get a few last things into 0.9 and can then get a
> > > candidate up for vote.  Here are my shortlist to include in 0.9:
> > >
> > > DRILL-1384 (Get off Calcite fork)
> > > DRILL-2479 (Correlated EXISTS containing an IN subquery fails to plan)
> > > DRILL-2712 (infinite prune)
> > > DRILL-2813 (Hive row count parse issue.)
> > > DRILL-2370/2762 (Distributed state issues)
> > > DRILL-2514/2413 (Impersonation)
> > >
> > > I believe all are sitting in or near review.  I'll volunteer to be
> > release
> > > manager unless someone else is interested in doing it.  Unless I hear
> > > otherwise, I'm going to create a release branch shortly.  Please feel
> > free
> > > to merge into master.  I'll probably just pick a fork point before any
> > > around the tip depending on the nature of the merges.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jacques
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message