drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Westin <cwes...@maprtech.com>
Subject Re: Updated JIRA workflow
Date Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:03:05 GMT
It seems wrong to use one state ("IN PROGRESS") to mean two different

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org> wrote:

> Hey Everybody,
> INFRA-8766 has been pending for a while to improve our workflow and match
> it to JIRA.  It just got resolved so let's try to make sure that we fairly
> represent the status of the issues.  Among other things, this will help new
> contributors understand what is going on.  If we see additional things we
> need, we can always request those things.
> The workflow can be seen at [1].
> Here is my proposed mapping of the new workflow to our process.
> New bug starts in OPEN.
> When someone starts working on it, they move it to IN PROGRESS.
> When someone puts a patch up for review, move to REVIEWABLE
> When a patch is reviewed and has pending changes, move to IN PROGRESS
> When patch is +1'd, move to ACCEPTED
> When a patch is merged, move to RESOLVED
> When an issue is verified, move to CLOSED
> When an issue is found to not be fixed, move to REOPENED
> Let me know if people think we should use these states or transitions
> differently.
> thanks,
> Jacques
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12703522/Screen%20Shot%202015-03-09%20at%2022.41.34.png

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message