distributedlog-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] First Release
Date Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:53:54 GMT
FYI. I merged the repackage script and repackage the namespace under
org.apache.distributedlog. All the changes for 0.4.0 are merged (except one
test case change - waiting for Liang's response). Ready to cut the first
release candidate.

- Sijie

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org> wrote:

> I've merged all the pull requests that need to be included in 0.4.0 (and
> both Jenkins and CI builds are green now). Also I moved inactive jiras to
> 0.5.0.
>
> There are a few issues remaining - https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DL%20AND%20resolution%20%
> 3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%
> 20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
> Most of them already have pull requests (but need to be rebased to latest
> master). So I can merge them.
>
> Hopefully I will be able to cut 0.4.0 release in following few days.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I will start check the jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0 release at
>> the weekend. If there is any jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0,
>> please comment in the jira.
>>
>> - Sijie
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI.
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-81 is created for tracking
>>> building the process.
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13024 and
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13023 for setting the dists
>>> for DL.
>>>
>>> - Sijie
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you for all the feedbacks. I will drive the release for this
>>>> version. So that we can have all the procedures documented in the wiki.
>>>>
>>>> I created the wiki page here for documenting the procedure:
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DL/Pr
>>>> eparing+DistributedLog+Releases
>>>>
>>>> - Sijie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaijia03@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>> Great to know the commitment of merge twitter's branch. Looking
>>>>> forward to
>>>>> see bookkeeper 4.5.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fpj@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > It does make sense, Sijie, thanks for the update.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -Flavio
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 05:12, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Flavio,
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I totally agreed that not using an official Apache  version
is not
>>>>> great
>>>>> > > for the community. We had a bookkeeper meetup last night. We've
>>>>> discussed
>>>>> > > the current situation with the community. We came to a commitment
>>>>> to
>>>>> > merge
>>>>> > > Twitter's branch back into bookkeeper 4.5. After that we won't
>>>>> maintain
>>>>> > our
>>>>> > > own branch and switch to 4.5.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Hope this make sense.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Sijie
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Nov 16, 2016 8:04 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fpj@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache
>>>>> BookKeeper
>>>>> > > release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs
to
>>>>> use the
>>>>> > > Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache
>>>>> BookKeeper.
>>>>> > > I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but
I'd
>>>>> be more
>>>>> > > comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper releases,
>>>>> which
>>>>> > are
>>>>> > > community driven.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it
is
>>>>> important
>>>>> > > for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need
to
>>>>> fix
>>>>> > DL-2.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > -Flavio
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart
>>>>> <lstewart@twitter.com.INVALID>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> +1
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny <
>>>>> franck.cuny@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker.
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu.ant@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>> +1 especially on DL-23.
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>> - Xi
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim
<
>>>>> > khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
>>>>> > >>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>> I am also interested in participating.
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>> - kn
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo
<sijie@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about
the first release.
>>>>> There are
>>>>> > >>>>> still a
>>>>> > >>>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding.
I think we
>>>>> need to
>>>>> > >>> pick
>>>>> > >>>>> up a
>>>>> > >>>>>> few items and cut the first release and
then iterate from
>>>>> there.
>>>>> > Here
>>>>> > >>>> is
>>>>> > >>>>> a
>>>>> > >>>>>> list of items that I think we should include:
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>:
>>>>> Repackaging
>>>>> > >>>>> namespace
>>>>> > >>>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out
and under reviewing)
>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>:
>>>>> support
>>>>> > scala
>>>>> > >>>>> 2.10
>>>>> > >>>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be
merged)
>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>:
Move
>>>>> DL to
>>>>> > >>>> depend
>>>>> > >>>>>> on
>>>>> > >>>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is
about the libthrift
>>>>> version,
>>>>> > >>>>> which
>>>>> > >>>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo.
There is a pull
>>>>> request out.
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2
>>>>> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2>
(using the
>>>>> official
>>>>> > >>>>>> bookkeeper
>>>>> > >>>>>> version) the blocker for the first release.
We can cut a new
>>>>> release
>>>>> > >>>> once
>>>>> > >>>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the
release procedure
>>>>> between
>>>>> > DL
>>>>> > >>>> and
>>>>> > >>>>>> BK.
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that
you believe it should
>>>>> be
>>>>> > >>>> included
>>>>> > >>>>> in
>>>>> > >>>>>> the first release.
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being
the release manager
>>>>> for
>>>>> > >>> first
>>>>> > >>>>>> release?
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> - Sijie
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> --
>>>>> > >>> -franck
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message