distributedlog-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] First Release
Date Sat, 03 Dec 2016 04:28:04 GMT
FYI.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-81 is created for tracking
building the process.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13024 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13023 for setting the dists for
DL.

- Sijie

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org> wrote:

> Thank you for all the feedbacks. I will drive the release for this
> version. So that we can have all the procedures documented in the wiki.
>
> I created the wiki page here for documenting the procedure: https://cwiki.
> apache.org/confluence/display/DL/Preparing+DistributedLog+Releases
>
> - Sijie
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaijia03@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Great to know the commitment of merge twitter's branch. Looking forward to
>> see bookkeeper 4.5.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fpj@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > It does make sense, Sijie, thanks for the update.
>> >
>> > -Flavio
>> >
>> > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 05:12, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Flavio,
>> > >
>> > > I totally agreed that not using an official Apache  version is not
>> great
>> > > for the community. We had a bookkeeper meetup last night. We've
>> discussed
>> > > the current situation with the community. We came to a commitment to
>> > merge
>> > > Twitter's branch back into bookkeeper 4.5. After that we won't
>> maintain
>> > our
>> > > own branch and switch to 4.5.
>> > >
>> > > Hope this make sense.
>> > >
>> > > Sijie
>> > >
>> > > On Nov 16, 2016 8:04 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fpj@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache BookKeeper
>> > > release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs to use
>> the
>> > > Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache
>> BookKeeper.
>> > > I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but I'd be
>> more
>> > > comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper releases,
>> which
>> > are
>> > > community driven.
>> > >
>> > > I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it is
>> important
>> > > for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need to fix
>> > DL-2.
>> > >
>> > > -Flavio
>> > >
>> > >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart <lstewart@twitter.com.INVALID
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> +1
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny <franck.cuny@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu.ant@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> +1 especially on DL-23.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - Xi
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim <
>> > khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
>> > >>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> I am also interested in participating.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> - kn
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about the first release.
There
>> are
>> > >>>>> still a
>> > >>>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think
we need to
>> > >>> pick
>> > >>>>> up a
>> > >>>>>> few items and cut the first release and then iterate
from there.
>> > Here
>> > >>>> is
>> > >>>>> a
>> > >>>>>> list of items that I think we should include:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>:
Repackaging
>> > >>>>> namespace
>> > >>>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing)
>> > >>>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>:
support
>> > scala
>> > >>>>> 2.10
>> > >>>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged)
>> > >>>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>:
Move DL
>> to
>> > >>>> depend
>> > >>>>>> on
>> > >>>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift
>> version,
>> > >>>>> which
>> > >>>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull
request
>> out.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2
>> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2>
(using the official
>> > >>>>>> bookkeeper
>> > >>>>>> version) the blocker for the first release. We can
cut a new
>> release
>> > >>>> once
>> > >>>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure
>> between
>> > DL
>> > >>>> and
>> > >>>>>> BK.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe
it should be
>> > >>>> included
>> > >>>>> in
>> > >>>>>> the first release.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being the release
manager for
>> > >>> first
>> > >>>>>> release?
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> - Sijie
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> -franck
>> > >>>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message