distributedlog-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Flavio Junqueira <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] First Release
Date Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:36:55 GMT
It does make sense, Sijie, thanks for the update.

-Flavio

> On 17 Nov 2016, at 05:12, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Flavio,
> 
> I totally agreed that not using an official Apache  version is not great
> for the community. We had a bookkeeper meetup last night. We've discussed
> the current situation with the community. We came to a commitment to merge
> Twitter's branch back into bookkeeper 4.5. After that we won't maintain our
> own branch and switch to 4.5.
> 
> Hope this make sense.
> 
> Sijie
> 
> On Nov 16, 2016 8:04 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fpj@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache BookKeeper
> release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs to use the
> Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache BookKeeper.
> I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but I'd be more
> comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper releases, which are
> community driven.
> 
> I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it is important
> for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need to fix DL-2.
> 
> -Flavio
> 
>> On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart <lstewart@twitter.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny <franck.cuny@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu.ant@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1 especially on DL-23.
>>>> 
>>>> - Xi
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am also interested in participating.
>>>>> 
>>>>> - kn
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about the first release. There are
>>>>> still a
>>>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we need to
>>> pick
>>>>> up a
>>>>>> few items and cut the first release and then iterate from there.
Here
>>>> is
>>>>> a
>>>>>> list of items that I think we should include:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>: Repackaging
>>>>> namespace
>>>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing)
>>>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>: support
scala
>>>>> 2.10
>>>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged)
>>>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>: Move
DL to
>>>> depend
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift version,
>>>>> which
>>>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull request out.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2
>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the official
>>>>>> bookkeeper
>>>>>> version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a new release
>>>> once
>>>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure between
DL
>>>> and
>>>>>> BK.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it should be
>>>> included
>>>>> in
>>>>>> the first release.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being the release manager for
>>> first
>>>>>> release?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Sijie
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -franck
>>> 


Mime
View raw message