distributedlog-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "john.lonergan" <john.loner...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Duplicate transaction ids
Date Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:01:39 GMT
My quotation was raised because there was another discussion that resulted in the answer  that
 the txn Id was equiv to the index in raft.  However i recall something about  uniqueness
 as well as upwards-only being important in raft around "stage machine safety " and "log
Perhaps they are not equivalent or perhaps I have the wrong idea?
Any idea which way it is?
-------- Original message --------From: Leigh Stewart <lstewart@twitter.com.INVALID>
Date: 20/09/2016  18:48  (GMT+00:00) To: dev@distributedlog.incubator.apache.org Subject:
Re: Duplicate transaction ids 
It simply must be non-decreasing- dup ids are ok.

Since txid is used for positioning, if you had a long series of identical
txids you might have to scan through a lot of records to find the record
you were really looking for if you were doing a lookup. Other than that
there should be no impact.


On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:37 AM, john.lonergan <john.lonergan@gmail.com>

> Docs say the txn Id is  an application supplied sequence number. It is
> required to be non-decreasing. Users usually use either timestamp or offset.
> What are  the consequences of publishing two consecutive messages with the
> same txn ids.
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message