directory-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard Sand" <rs...@idfconnect.com>
Subject Re: RFC 2696 and total entries in the search result
Date Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:44:04 GMT
Ok so basically do not pre-populate the number of pages.

I guess applications that do this are backed by an RDBMS not an LDAP? Or 
they're just being really expensive?




------ Original Message ------
From: "Emmanuel Lécharny" <elecharny@gmail.com>
To: users@directory.apache.org
Sent: 9/22/2016 8:21:53 AM
Subject: Re: RFC 2696 and total entries in the search result

>Le 22/09/16 à 14:18, Richard Sand a écrit :
>>  Ok, what is the proper technique then?
>
>always pull at least one element than the number you can store in one
>page : that will tell you if you will have a next page or not.
>
>This save CPU on the server, a lot of CPU. Actually, getting the number
>of results beforhand results in doing the request twice, more or less
>(for servers that handle such things).
>


Mime
View raw message