directory-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kiran Ayyagari <kayyag...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Upgrade procedures?
Date Tue, 09 Aug 2016 15:56:38 GMT
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Le 09/08/16 à 17:43, Kiran Ayyagari a écrit :
> > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Le 09/08/16 à 17:05, Hal Deadman a écrit :
> >>> I copied over the two new attribute type ldif files from a default m23
> >>> instance to the correct location in my existing instance and replaced
> the
> >>> m21 jars with m23 jars in my existing install and the servers seem to
> >> have
> >>> started up in working order.
> >>>
> >>> partitions\schema\ou=schema\cn=apache\ou=attributetypes\m-
> >> oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.1.2.12.ldif
> >>> partitions\schema\ou=schema\cn=apache\ou=attributetypes\m-
> >> oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.1.2.13.ldif
> >>> On an unrelated topic, is the data in syncrepl-data important or can it
> >> be
> >>> purged at some point if both servers are up and in-sync?
> >> AFAIR, it stores a limited number of updated entries. This is important
> >> to avoid a full resync if a server gets disconnected for some time :
> >> when reconnecting, if the oldest update in this file is older than teh
> >> deconnection time, then replicatio will be done by sending all the
> >> recent udpates to teh reconnected server.
> >>
> >> If both server are in sync, you can purge this file.
> >>
> >> kiran, can you confirm ?
> >>
> > yes, this data can be copied over to the new location.
> > Discarding this can cause losing some modify and delete events.
> But if both servers are in sync, there is no risk of losing anything,
> AFAICT.
>
yep

>
> The idea is to avoid copying useless data when migrating.
>
> agree

Kiran

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message