Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13B391826A for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76484 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2015 00:46:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 76430 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2015 00:46:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 76419 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2015 00:46:52 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:46:52 +0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com (mail-ig0-f169.google.com [209.85.213.169]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 8A3E41A0325 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcsj18 with SMTP id sj18so21264676igc.1 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:46:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.48.9 with SMTP id q9mr380750icf.21.1435279611873; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.31.204 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:46:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <558C9C3E.5080309@brightandbrown.com> References: <558C9C3E.5080309@brightandbrown.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:46:51 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Missing entries From: Kiran Ayyagari To: "users@directory.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6146a06b77e705196113ec --90e6ba6146a06b77e705196113ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:26 AM, William Osmond wrote: > Hello all, > I've been running Apache DS version 2.0.0.v20130628 successfully for some > years now, however I've hit a snag. The application is only showing 10 of > ~750 entries that used to be present under a particular DN. If I view the > master.db in a text editor I can see that the entries are still there, > however they're not displayed in the LDAP Browser. Any help would be > greatly appreciated! > > most likely the RDN index was corrupted, please refer to this mail http://markmail.org/thread/jtpmbsivolpyb5sc#query:+page:1+mid:huaqvbqi7djc4swb+state:results and follow the steps mentioned in it, you should be able to see all the data afterwards > -Bill > -- Kiran Ayyagari http://keydap.com --90e6ba6146a06b77e705196113ec--