directory-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: A query on kerberos testing via annotations
Date Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:53:56 GMT
Le 28/11/14 16:30, Colm O hEigeartaigh a écrit :
> Thanks for your reply Kiran.
>
> I figured out the problem - the KDCServer annotation was configured with
> two transports (TCP/UDP) which were using separate ports (as both were
> unspecified). Using "super.getKdcServer().getTcpPort" as the port for
> krb5.conf does not work, as it requires the UDP port.
>
> So I got it working by just configuring a single UDP Transport +
> substituting the port given by
> super.getKdcServer().getTransports()[0].getPort() into the krb5.conf.
>
> Is there a way that I am missing to have both TCP + UDP protocols share a
> random port, when configuring a KDCServer via annotations?

I don't think it's supported. When you specifiy 0 (or -1, I don't
exactly remember), it generates a random port for each transport.

That could be a good addition to the annotation though. Not terribly
useful except for protocol using TCP and UDP (like kerberos...)


Mime
View raw message