directory-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcos Mendez <mar...@jitisoft.com>
Subject Re: newbie question regarding master db + file size
Date Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:46:04 GMT
thanks!

On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:32 PM, <Carlo.Accorsi@ibs-ag.com> <Carlo.Accorsi@ibs-ag.com>
wrote:

> Hi Marcos, 
> We’ve used the   javax.imageio.ImageWriter to significantly reduce the size of jpeg
images. 
> 
> A 4.2MB image at 30% quality is 1/10 the size and the differences are only slightly noticeable
from the original.
> 
> Here is how it the sizes differ  between 10-100% quality.
> 
> img-10.jpg	  200194
> img-20.jpg	  288217
> img-30.jpg	  375060
> img-40.jpg	  453826
> img-50.jpg	  542917
> img-60.jpg	  621533
> img-70.jpg	  819533
> img-80.jpg	  990477
> img-90.jpg	 1686143
> img-100.jpg	 4251385
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcos Mendez [mailto:marcos@jitisoft.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 1:21 PM
> To: users@directory.apache.org
> Subject: Re: newbie question regarding master db + file size
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:46, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Marco,
>> 
>> we have had long discussion about using an external storage (ie 
>> separate files) for things like pictures. It's not really easy, and 
>> I'm not sure it worth the effort.
> 
> understood. thanks.
> 
> 
>> All in all, there is no advantage in compressing a picture : it 
>> already uses a compressed format, the gain would be null. Using B64 
>> encoding would be even worth, the file size would be 33% bigger...
> 
> agreed. images already have that. again being a newbie i don't know how it is actually
stored. if its just the binary then it is fine. was more concerned about the other (if any)
encodings.
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Marcos Mendez <marcos@jitisoft.com> wrote:
>>> i would also suggest compressing those resources if hex or base 64 encoding is
used to store them. you guys may do that already....
>>> 
>>> On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:08, Marcos Mendez <marcos@jitisoft.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> ok. thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> no, there is no such support in the server (we have discusses about 
>>>>> storing this kind of big blobs outside of the master db file but 
>>>>> was not implemented)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Marcos Mendez <marcos@jitisoft.com>
wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We're having an issue with the size of the master database file,

>>>>>> due to the fact that we're including pictures for people. We're 
>>>>>> using a version control mechanism that has a maximum of 50mb and
we've already passed it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is there any way we can put those entries outside of that file but

>>>>>> still be accessible as LDAP entries? We also don't want to have 
>>>>>> them stored at a separate location (eg. providing a file/url path,

>>>>>> etc type solutions). The organization really wants them in the directory.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Marcos
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Installed version: apacheds-2.0.0-M14-64bit.bin
>>>>>> OS: Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Kiran Ayyagari
>>>>> http://keydap.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Cordialement,
>> Emmanuel Lécharny
>> www.iktek.com


Mime
View raw message