directory-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kiran Ayyagari <kayyag...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Evaluating ApacheDS as part of a preemptive cache
Date Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:01:39 GMT
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Tom Bruser <ml@tombruser.com> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ayyagarikiran@gmail.com [mailto:ayyagarikiran@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of
> Kiran Ayyagari
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:36 PM
> To: users@directory.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Evaluating ApacheDS as part of a preemptive cache
>
> >>On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Tom <ml@tombruser.com> wrote:
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ayyagarikiran@gmail.com [mailto:ayyagarikiran@gmail.com] On
> >> Behalf Of Kiran Ayyagari
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:50 AM
> >> To: users@directory.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Evaluating ApacheDS as part of a preemptive cache
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Tom <ml@tombruser.com> wrote:
> >>
>
> > I would suggest you to go with the 2.0.0-M10(or M11 which will be
> > released
> > next week)
> > The current 2.0 (milestone) version is much more advanced and feature
> rich
> than the 1.5.x series
>
> I'm surprised to see this answer since from what I understand, GA hasn't
> been scheduled for 2.0 yet.  I apologize as I should have mentioned that
> this is for a mission critical system with up to a 250K user base if it
> makes a difference.  Is the current milestone release still the
> recommendation based on that?
>
> indeed it is, the 2.0 version has improved backend support and has
multi-master replication to name a few



-- 
Kiran Ayyagari
http://keydap.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message