Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4E8B2058.9070205@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:03:52 +0200
From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@directory.apache.org
Subject: Re: Indexing schema attributes
References: 
 <CACFiKfpane=897yA9SXWCdODzKxC_k4OC6C+tw=NtH-KR3mqRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABzFU-f0p72=_WO-Og8DJ6QAy7HogW7FbEP266RV2pSWqFVM_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACFiKfoVSE41F5TLheGZVTC1oshvD_b+2oMfiWbGSPtgvrNjhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABzFU-eNkeD9ebrGMooZ0o3UVWBMBCY=jVLsBAuEm2b7Zm1R2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACFiKfr5E4VzEQHZQq47fvqH+=euXo-D9L7jjVci_5voaMTFGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4E8A8BF2.9000908@gmail.com>
 <CABzFU-c+8Riuf=ES9-bP-4Mdstf8oCAj5nYpin8TcuLgtcOmbA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABzFU-c+8Riuf=ES9-bP-4Mdstf8oCAj5nYpin8TcuLgtcOmbA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 10/4/11 3:12 PM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny<elecharny@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On 10/4/11 2:11 AM, Craig Setera wrote:
>>> I actually assumed that to be the case.  In our case, we did an LDIF
>>> export,
>>> set up the indices and re-imported the LDIF.  Before the addition of the
>>> indices, our search would return a single result and after we would get
>>> zero
>>> results.  I initially attributed that to the indices not being correctly
>>> registered, but from what you are saying that is not the case.
>> We need to add some extended operation to get the index created when it's
> IMO an extended operation won't be efficient, and also requires the
> server to cease any updates from happening
> while the new index is building.

This is implicit. We need stop suspend all operations while the index is 
rebuilt.
> Currently the server requires a
> restart after adding a new index, which I see as a safe approach
>> added after some data have been added. Another option (and I think we
>> already have done that) would be to have a command line option that can be
>> run on a stopped server to recreate the index. AFAIR, Kiran, you wrote such
>> a tool, right ?
>>
> yes, but never updated after my initial implementation

We need to get it included in 2.0 :)
>> In any case, we should be able to create this index without having to
>> export/import the data before 2.0
>>
> export/import is no longer necessary in the latest versions(>1.5.7)
> except that the server needs to be restarted after
> adding a new index/indices

Do you mean the index is rebuilt at startup ?


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com