Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2499 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 22:11:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 22:11:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 24959 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:11:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 24906 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:11:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 24898 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 22:11:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:11:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.178] (HELO mail-iy0-f178.google.com) (209.85.210.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:11:18 +0000 Received: by iyj8 with SMTP id 8so5476475iyj.37 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:10:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.228.74 with SMTP id jd10mr7299242icb.280.1299017457418; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:10:57 -0800 (PST) Sender: mail@stefan-seelmann.de Received: by 10.231.11.193 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:10:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D6D25A0.1050506@apache.org> References: <4D6D01BE.8030003@gmail.com> <4D6D25A0.1050506@apache.org> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:10:57 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Bo4LWzYs9GMfyVgxpoT7PuyDt5I Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Community] Proposals for those interested in participating From: Stefan Seelmann To: users@directory.apache.org, elecharny@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Emmanuel L=C3=A9charny wrote: > On 3/1/11 5:50 PM, Stefano Gargiulo wrote: >> >> Very interesting! Proposal #1 Will rock (world need this kind of webapps= ) >> and also the new api is a great thing for who wants to write a custom us= er >> management interface (i need this, for now i wrote one in php but i will >> be >> very happy to switch to your ldap api when mature) > > I would add something regarding the Web UI : we would be very interested = in > using Eclipse RAP [1] to get the current Apache Studio application availa= ble > as a Web UI, with the same look and feel. We have already conducted some > experiments the last two years, and we know we aren't too far from being > able to provide a single applications which can be used either as a > standalone application, or as a plugin inside eclipse, or thanks to RAP, = as > a web UI. > > What would be absolutely great would be to see if this can be done with t= he > current version (RAP 1.4-M6 is announced for march 18), and what are the > impacts on the current application. I think RAPification of Studio is a bit special. First, as Alex already mentioned, it will be a heavy web application. Second, Studio uses shared and Server components, they are heavily modified, I don't foresee stability here within the next months. It would be necessary to deal with changed packages and dependencies all the time. That doesn't make it easy to work on a RAP version. Last not least, IMHO it is required to have deep knowledge of Eclipse RCP and Plugin development. Also experience with RAP would be good. I don't think that it is possible to get it working with 'only' Java skills within a fair time, this is really a big task. Kind Regards, Stefan