From users-return-3304-apmail-directory-users-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Fri Jun 18 13:18:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33221 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 13:18:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 13:18:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 12539 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 13:18:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 12385 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 13:18:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 12377 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2010 13:18:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:18:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lapsap7@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.50] (HELO mail-fx0-f50.google.com) (209.85.161.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:18:43 +0000 Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so807726fxm.37 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:18:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zdpXIFlylpvQBsU19Cz0i3Ct8rZFZtzmvkXkSV1zy6U=; b=KlGHchqjlC2+Dbuyf/yfcPZE6wvUgLpxUFlIpYZ6aWweDQZUPNJ+nGAJ4XAbdCQzuM 3IDt1sANmjmGRLbX3tI7iafkuS9z1v6E0H/91sfMHQipRTzkZyhskgjWIYM0m/tbX6/V Jw4ngiJMAK955uP8IAlC9m27XnT6WhmaRtC5A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=tQSyIjBJGRqzXyTjLC0YpzegwrpzPTA7hw7A/mxIXBhwatfpLLWPYrXUV/IaZ4w0oI tHyWVLp42YIci7sY2nc3t4HXEei9tLBvxsWOik033igH+6+37N5rld/NZXdUmKmuzwlm HaG7JVrAWGjFAA6OPB3FOXIZPzSVcaG51wrpE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.29.156 with SMTP id q28mr846760fac.77.1276867101983; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.120.200 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:18:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C1B6C6E.40003@gmail.com> References: <4C1B6C6E.40003@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:18:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Suggestion for web site: stating out requirement for running Apache DS From: Je suis la poubelle To: users@directory.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 14:54, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > The problem is that ADS run perfectly well with 64Mb. Why would we mention > that 450Mb is required ? Are you sure of that? Because when I check Windows' task manager, it's clear that stopping Apache DS service frees up to 450MB of memory! And when ADS service is starting, the hard disk is running real a lot, meaning that there're a lot of swap. So I can't say "ADS is running *perfectly well* with 64MB".