Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28795 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2009 21:04:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2009 21:04:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 51878 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2009 21:04:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 51819 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2009 21:04:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 51809 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2009 21:04:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:04:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=FS_REPLICA,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.219] (HELO mail-ew0-f219.google.com) (209.85.219.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:04:08 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so981519ewy.1 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:03:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=T+5yTC1WPrx1R70QwzNWbqH9Oln6jnbat2OPRwHksVI=; b=Y/48scIiOpYvPuJ9152xTnFi14zdcyGMZM2+DJqk8bZopQy08gfQyEJZQRT3xCqygv AwNT26htd8yymtuwwTxTHNYtEJahcsZcRgdeKh0cLu7R6dLI7+6Pk2aSJJ8fzUlIka2j JIgTVDI4zC8ol7oQlC6bRFja9myCyHhyrelvs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=x0mktO8deLfI2o5PeNj6TbkiPUk4Hy8xVuamBPSQwKItoue0pAMUmHxDZx79JqRhHQ hnMfOpH/1Vt15ge34Fl6+nfY0/VwapIENBgWeFqOre5qanz6rG7DH0iv4miuuO0L+gHX 6D5CmeLJtjZeHHvLdC8z+6u1fOwWir6P/BYsk= Received: by 10.213.96.3 with SMTP id f3mr7675508ebn.51.1260219828722; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from emmanuel-lecharnys-MacBook-Pro.local (vol75-3-82-66-216-176.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.216.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm9729774eyx.46.2009.12.07.13.03.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:03:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B1D6DB2.5080402@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:03:46 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?RW1tYW51ZWwgTMKOY2hhcm55?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: Replication options in 1.5.5? References: <4B19695F.3030406@mfoundry.com> <4B1A8812.8020902@gmail.com> <4B1BE07C.7000001@mfoundry.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1BE07C.7000001@mfoundry.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Craig Setera a écrit : > Does anyone have any experience building out a master/slave setup for > Apache DS (or any directory service)? Hi, as Kiran said, Mitosis was deadly bugged, and we deciced to remove the code from he server atm. We are working on writing a RFC 4533 replication based solution, giving our users the benefit of some proved replication system, as OpenLDAP has already implemented it. As an extra bonus, that will mean we will be able to replicate OpenLDAP and ApacheDS together. We don't have a timeline for this atm.