From users-return-2802-apmail-directory-users-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Wed Nov 04 17:54:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22583 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2009 17:54:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2009 17:54:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 46779 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 17:54:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 46746 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 17:54:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 46736 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2009 17:54:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:54:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.181] (HELO mail-yx0-f181.google.com) (209.85.210.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:54:46 +0000 Received: by yxe11 with SMTP id 11so6275101yxe.15 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:54:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dlYd9dQ9Ispf6K/1Y1hz56CJcHIJIk6D166lm7NLVKY=; b=foCV5S4hbiRIPKZ0p/+4WM01PoRvBiG3q9FRr/8yMi9Uu4fMYACmg017IhpELd023O qfEaB4/0znkRfb+Pn3Fhr1w4rCtjsYXLLix3GvFA2Mj7F4rmCIZNkSVQJI94SlUjkTma wvXoHkNQjEyNBQRpE8rV+2dzVvn1t2E1oX0oM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kLQLt2qbJ1+V0/aAAq6lKk0dECFVTyzRpzJapB1dftdTJnreFu0vmrfYhdfZ9OFfBV xInNKhKWSGwQeW/6K7HMfY1bzQ3sWB1axK+fj6XBcP5kmfTg3jh+8LpNnV7/yCm5nJhK KgW42BNhX17wrRDq9yjoAK3/8RzKDqriR/bJc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.197.142 with SMTP id z14mr191089hbi.213.1257357264944; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:54:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:54:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OSGi UserAdmin and Apache DS From: Alex Karasulu To: users@directory.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636025c0a21fece04778f4d1b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636025c0a21fece04778f4d1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 James, On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:26 AM, James Peltzer wrote: > > Hello everyone, > When I have searched for an LDAP-server-backed implementation of the OSGi > UserAdmin service, I keep finding year-old (or older) posts on this list > about people 'getting ready' to implement it. > > It's now November of 2009 and I was wondering if any progress has been made > on this? > > I have an OSGi project with a requirement to use an LDAP-backed server for > managing user account information but I prefer to use OSGi services where > possible. > > If anyone is aware of an implementation of UserAdmin that is LDAP-backed > but is separate from Apache DS, that would be worth knowing too. > > Thanks for any info you can provide, > > There really is no other UserAdmin, or ConfigAdmin service backed by LDAP minus the prototypes we worked on a while back. We certainly want to do this but there is little to no bandwidth at the moment. Implementing it is easy for most of us at Directory but we just need the time and at the present moment we're all trying to make ends meat. Feel free to get involved and work on this with us. Kind Regards, Alex > James > -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org --001636025c0a21fece04778f4d1b--