Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31717 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2009 04:51:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2009 04:51:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 6007 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2009 04:51:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 5944 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2009 04:51:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 5934 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2009 04:51:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:51:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.216 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.216] (HELO mail-gx0-f216.google.com) (209.85.217.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:51:43 +0000 Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so3870560gxk.1 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:51:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ihZ7e0Xr5df9Fm67N0rJEBxrjOg8Y0buIRP4CKI3Qzo=; b=MpNVwNZ2L9wkdMLJ6OWL7Les0s8FLTJUC4jGeCjQ+ViOVilaetCfGM8B8L/SXWQ5Sb 8fR8LWHOyukd0sap9zOCgUf2HFCkrnrcDIdgH+EvfTsRDB6VyiS1kzcTz7VQi1NUYw1d jnfZ6JzCZmjp3wT4+ibWm/NTYWEfXmt8NE4lw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=c7pYOGtvHH5kVl5fgqHrxsAxSLJcy581S27QIfo7JP2/xeoEmpBqqaFAttktDr68va yW4oVqgRHLASS14SAB7hN44ZlzBs34QS9ZiCsYOHky/l5MjpJaLclUoXeq+KAMQ1LV6q /h0HoB7fmGqWQQBqxVRoBuZOSlYkCG5etwD+k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.147.1 with SMTP id z1mr126924ann.140.1255236682025; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:51:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <96B58CE679D9514B87F3149C1036B1B33B692D@INFRA-BLN-EX.psi.de> References: <4ACCA023.2050701@tbee.org> <4ACF050F.8050700@tbee.org> <96B58CE679D9514B87F3149C1036B1B33B692D@INFRA-BLN-EX.psi.de> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 07:51:21 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Kerberos support From: Alex Karasulu To: users@directory.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68deb6f8a8dcf0475a19001 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e68deb6f8a8dcf0475a19001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I guess someone was trying to warn you not to use this in a PRODUCTION environment. I'm thinking the reasoning was because of how little we've actually tested this protocol in live situations over prolonged use as we have the LDAP side. Alex On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Rippich, Andrej wrote: > Hi all, > I have a question regarding the Kerberos support in Apache DS. > In the documentation I've found the warning "Do not use this in > productive environment...". > What does it mean exactly? > Is this warning related to the example in the documentation or the > Kerberos support in general? > Thanks > Andrej > -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org --0016e68deb6f8a8dcf0475a19001--