Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75817 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2009 08:29:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2009 08:29:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 45328 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2009 08:29:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 45290 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2009 08:29:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 45280 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2009 08:29:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:29:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.209 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.209] (HELO mail-bw0-f209.google.com) (209.85.218.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:29:47 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so2895505bwz.3 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:29:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vDO02KWYw8Q+kWwYHHRxjlr4Q0V6rFdpv2g6TDxVqQw=; b=eeg7Ss7LQHvECS/Hrb5FmLAppPjssEi2ZDTSYI5W9z8VhpU2v+b+ZBMzNI+leez+a9 pnDws/emXPNV0FhIjB5FRdFOXgym9YAy3hNHlvqTYKK4VnXAPDzAa329aV8UFBk2+D6R he2L0UU/JW3S/OhAY1+eUDfGqMHCI0rYoD6uY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pRA9W9TfKbK07vwlfWVLIV6h14Rt/I51kDVWqFJN7tdAM79m514fBAXnXRBG+dqNXJ BffFIxrhkVuMFLDYIwypKDcidarB34efuiYjQJoTy/RwQtdZ3UjO0CRDZKWhKcyDbmSR Uw4OtyyAB9XjkUK9eaRIWtULEtx8/E3e0S6Nw= Received: by 10.204.7.144 with SMTP id d16mr3494517bkd.209.1250584167273; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? (vol75-3-82-66-216-176.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.216.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y15sm6102230fkd.47.2009.08.18.01.29.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Emmanuel Lecharny Message-ID: <4A8A666C.5060401@nextury.com> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:29:32 +0200 From: Emmanuel Lecharny User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: [Studio] Should we drop support for the Linux PPC version of Studio? References: <98d8c0860908180037w3b857ba4r29bc6330199e1@mail.gmail.com> <4A8A61F4.5080809@apache.org> <98d8c0860908180118s2a5a3d4cmcef844336e3d0388@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <98d8c0860908180118s2a5a3d4cmcef844336e3d0388@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: > However, I was also wondering about a Windows 64 bit version... But as, I > don't have any machine to test it on, it would be very hard to know if we're > delivering a working app... > We might also consider the forthcoming Windows 7 -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel L�charny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org