Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40631 invoked from network); 30 May 2009 17:12:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 May 2009 17:12:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 96543 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2009 17:12:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 96457 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2009 17:12:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 96447 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2009 17:12:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 May 2009 17:12:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.225] (HELO mail-ew0-f225.google.com) (209.85.219.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 May 2009 17:12:12 +0000 Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so2679139ewy.25 for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 10:11:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Khlk+mcuCE0H2jPBcJqryZwhCa36ns/SlzpCINFNYh8=; b=maB63BwR0bLPElOrJvZuP1odRXTkePSnOvLVg+4jvtIouGRZZ3oiGS+C0Jg4qUdJws WxMqdzXz7UHYuU5Kj1NzHuIPgxLTnOpnRY8+DiLPsEFHihJSwQPzZ6fz7P3b+A4buNjv nZzbNrgXngzDcPMkd63yc8q0ZP8TqBt7I3nuA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BtketSsBiANLhiAZtEINtjVZK/uKQgIdCCOHDy2KOiYH3pn2SyxbihUHGxBhIgyXui crVee/AkQL6kaBnWBrQakefssuaL6HB3+QpXoQ0QDx8xO2X9Pqs+BKCMQtVoLEqWBdcO PoxAT7D8qMfTWJeRp+U5Df2MbBIQQcaUTKCss= Received: by 10.210.33.3 with SMTP id g3mr4041245ebg.85.1243703512101; Sat, 30 May 2009 10:11:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.1? (vol75-3-82-66-216-176.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.216.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm4660461eyx.3.2009.05.30.10.11.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 30 May 2009 10:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Emmanuel Lecharny Message-ID: <4A2168D7.9060500@nextury.com> Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 19:11:51 +0200 From: Emmanuel Lecharny User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: Apacheds - max number of connections References: <4A1CF812.8040102@nextury.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Alex Karasulu wrote: > This sounds like an interesting use case though for us don't you think > Emmanuel? Yes, probably. We can use a filter in MINA to do that, then it will just be a matter of managing a configuration element to limit the incomming connection. All in all, that should not be a questions of days to implement such a feature. Much more hours. > Lee I would add this as a feature JIRA. This is definitely low > priority but it's an interesting case that arise on occasion. > JIRA, JIRA, JIRA ! -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel L�charny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org