Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of imavroukakis@gameaccount.com
 designates 83.244.222.83 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <49942DB3.4090206@gameaccount.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:09:55 +0000
From: Yiannis Mavroukakis <imavroukakis@gameaccount.com>
Organization: GameAccount
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@directory.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ApacheDS] Mitosis
References: <498AFE3A.7050406@vogon.net>
 <498FFF8E.9030000@gameaccount.com>	 <4990405E.7050203@gameaccount.com>
 <4992F27A.3070005@gameaccount.com>
	 <a32f6b020902110811l1f953bf0xb3d76bceb6ca5475@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4992FD60.6000401@gameaccount.com>
	 <a32f6b020902111514l6c2a2bdfy72e7bcdd4a34e5ff@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49940B2E.6060709@gameaccount.com>
	 <d45b08f00902120348l61f4daau5216880146a980c7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49940E19.3090900@gameaccount.com>
 <d45b08f00902120414k5071fafei6f7c9fe065891ded@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d45b08f00902120414k5071fafei6f7c9fe065891ded@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

That's actually a huge shame (I'm using the 1.5.5 snapshots). It's going 
to be very difficult for me to justify ApacheDS in our project,
as it will be embedded in a server cluster, so replication is fairly 
critical, and it looks like we will have to do manually...(eeeeek)

Y.

Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Yiannis Mavroukakis
> <imavroukakis@gameaccount.com> wrote:
>   
>> Ah shame! Then I suppose my question is, is it functional although not
>> production ready ?:-) I'm willing to take the risk :-)
>>     
>
> Not even working in 1.5.4 ... Really a shame. It was working on 1.5.1,
> but we slowly but surely broke it while doing a lot of small
> modifications. It was not intended, but at some point in the process,
> we disabled the Mitosis tests because they were temporarely broken,
> but forgot to enable tehm back, so after a few months and a couple of
> release, we just thought that Mitosis tests were OK, when they were
> simply disabled.
>
> And now, we are trying to fix the whole bunch, and it takes time, as
> in the mean time we switched to MINA 2.0 and such other big
> modifications...
>
> Really, shame shame shame !
>
>