Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: parallel binds
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:45:12 +0100
Message-ID: <EFBD5C230E22D74CB1317BB67979F88D066C28E1@mailgw.avideurope.com>
In-Reply-To: <48FC5D90.3040900@nextury.com>
Thread-Topic: parallel binds
Thread-Index: Ackynte6P2gj/ksFQsCHxBvhknoNbAAAxG0Q
From: "Tanja Ertl" <Tanja_Ertl@avid.com>
To: <users@directory.apache.org>

Hi Emmanuel,

My client fails already with 75 requests, I don't think that this is =
overwhelmed compared to 900 requests from 9 different machines.
How did your client setup look like? If I introduce a delay of 5 ms =
between the Threads startup, all seems to work fine. The problem seems =
to be that the request arrive all exactly at the same time.

Bye,
Tanja

-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:elecharny@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Montag, 20. Oktober 2008 12:30
To: users@directory.apache.org
Subject: Re: parallel binds

Tanja Ertl wrote:
> No, I didn't. I just tried from one machine 75 requests in parallel.
> I could try, but I don't see how that would change the situation. Are =
there any restrictions that only x connections per host are allowed?
no. Asd I said, we have tested the server to absorb something like 900=20
request in //. So maybe your client (with 100 threads) is a bit =
overwhelmed.

Btw, there is a parameter on the server to set the number of threads=20
handling incoming requests :
  <standardThreadPool id=3D"standardThreadPool" maxThreads=3D"8"/>

You can change this number. (the more processor you have on your server, =

the higher the number of thread you can use).

--=20
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel L=E9charny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org