Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12951 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2008 10:30:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2008 10:30:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 40776 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2008 10:30:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 40744 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2008 10:30:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 40733 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2008 10:30:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:30:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.152 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.152] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:29:01 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so1437075fge.3 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:29:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=9QzraH0ejAp6U2uZvFVRJ2qNOCC/VufZVoovkwxXlo8=; b=hXB152YgroqQ4MfXugVyLaHp/pn5f3eIhjO00/oRNNbrbaFnftahwZXjTFJzyVXJWc 0ur5vz2fe9VmuPp+Ha0gv1H7usnbotYCljzIRKjOtSroKWRmjTfdh/9nJ0H1qXiqVZnV nyX2u0OXs0APP45tjr8VVaDMqXeplmTJZkYfo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=nr6OU1o7SRtWclhAJintrXyFmN4AqAvw3rocdCSSmbXGe7gtGV8ob+cZcLrqmBQeqd kdjivo3wgLW4TpRyxesEDLayShnjx1dpCIR7TuNx6G5XC+E777NMtztP4owbq5MREWz2 sILxdSW69VCS8Lud7fyYCLL5gjgpPOlW417VI= Received: by 10.86.80.17 with SMTP id d17mr6620693fgb.24.1224498578501; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.13? ([78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm9484560fga.1.2008.10.20.03.29.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48FC5D90.3040900@nextury.com> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:29:36 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: parallel binds References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Emmanuel Lecharny X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Tanja Ertl wrote: > No, I didn't. I just tried from one machine 75 requests in parallel. > I could try, but I don't see how that would change the situation. Are there any restrictions that only x connections per host are allowed? no. Asd I said, we have tested the server to absorb something like 900 request in //. So maybe your client (with 100 threads) is a bit overwhelmed. Btw, there is a parameter on the server to set the number of threads handling incoming requests : You can change this number. (the more processor you have on your server, the higher the number of thread you can use). -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel L�charny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org