From users-return-1473-apmail-directory-users-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Tue May 27 13:04:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92786 invoked from network); 27 May 2008 13:04:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 May 2008 13:04:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 10325 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2008 13:04:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 10292 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2008 13:04:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 10281 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2008 13:04:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 May 2008 06:04:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.138.39.159] (HELO dragon4.automation.siemens.com) (194.138.39.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 May 2008 13:03:58 +0000 Received: from erld604x.erlf.siemens.de (erld604x.erlf.siemens.de [194.138.228.204]) by dragon4.automation.siemens.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FA714F5F for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 15:04:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from erld003a.ww004.siemens.net (erld003a.ww004.siemens.net [157.163.249.22]) by erld604x.erlf.siemens.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4546375F for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 15:04:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lpzs214a.ww004.siemens.net ([147.54.218.14]) by erld003a.ww004.siemens.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 27 May 2008 15:04:18 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8BFFA.2C87D535" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: General Question related to object containment Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 15:04:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4FC2D861F218944DAFF107A3A7DC9944023240A8@lpzs214a.ww004.siemens.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: General Question related to object containment Thread-Index: Aci/+izkwxfvVgEGTva1z+46v78o2Q== From: "Eternach, Andreas (EXT)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 May 2008 13:04:18.0449 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C357810:01C8BFFA] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8BFFA.2C87D535 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, =20 i am quite new to LADP and Apache Directory Server. And i really hope you can help me with a containment question. =20 I have created a new Schema, which defines just two object-classes (lets call them Product and ProductProperty). Of course ProductProperty is a child of Product, i.e. Products consist of ProductProperties. =20 Therefore i need to ensure, that instances of ProductProperty may only be created below instances of Product. =20 Does anyone know how to define such rules / restrictions? Is it defined in some RFC? =20 Thanks in advance, Andreas ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8BFFA.2C87D535--