directory-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Feedback needed] ADS pros and cons ?
Date Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:00:12 GMT
Denis Cardon wrote:
> Hi Ossi,
>
>> 1) we currently use ADS for experiments, we plan to replace MS Active 
>> Directory Server with a more open LDAP Server
>
> actually Active Directory is more than just a ldap server. It bundles 
> a customified ldap server, a kerberos server, a dns server, and some 
> ms rpc stuff. So apache directory server could not, by itself stands 
> for an active directory replacement (unless the only thing you need is 
> the ldap part).
Actually Apache Directory Server is more than just a ldap server too. It 
bundles a *standard and compliant* ldap server 
(http://directory.apache.org/community%26resources/open-group-certification.html), 
a kerberos server, a dns server, a NTP server, a DHCP server, a SSO 
solution (TripleSec) and a tool (Apache DirectoryStudio) which can't be 
compared to LDP, because it would like comparing M$ Word (tm) to M$ 
Notepad(tm).

And when it comes to LDAP server compliance, please just read this : 
http://www.symas.com/documents/Adam-Eval1-0.pdf

So we think that ADS could stands for an active directory replacement. 
Even if you just need the ldap part.

*But*, because nothing is perfect, it has to be documented, tested, 
fixed, etc. We need volunteers for that.
>
> Open source projects are getting close to a replacement of ActiveDS, 
> and bundling ApacheDS + Samba4alpha3 + Bind/sdb_ldap should almost do 
> the trick, however it is not yet very polished and might need some 
> twicking.
I agree fully with the polishing and twicking needs !


-- 
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel L├ęcharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org



Mime
View raw message