Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46683 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2007 09:21:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jun 2007 09:21:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 56104 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2007 09:21:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 56083 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2007 09:21:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 56069 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2007 09:21:24 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:21:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.236 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.236] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.236) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:21:20 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t5so412371wxc for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:20:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=r02X+gQCRJgDV5nS933ZcS+mANq9AwnAZVPXJ0mKvJPIUwRvufFnxc1LNu4TXPRji4U9kEylNgHYHAO3RplGntG8WIOdaYdwR++qq5ZX2aBSlWJISpAbPL05oJ4BiaNL2ucKy0IwrjtsPqYWvSOaJlK5HWJkBYoNpv228+ZLM4A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=YTAy9UrUMk4fcql66oyBJY/WWi9HCAC9ryRajoFSy0+PCi1qvLDjdHaG6dPJTq/5QuTdh7WvL6n8bQJV/4z92mf8VcwJFQWTFPU9rvnJRNiCF9665311w05BDJX+tf1y02wxth8NGEUa5TcASo2ndqEXvbxYUpyWUQVPq75kIGA= Received: by 10.90.95.11 with SMTP id s11mr1339050agb.1182417659157; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.51.11 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <98d8c0860706210220i60d065e9lc3ea03e180430637@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:20:59 +0200 From: "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" Sender: pajbam@gmail.com To: users@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: Directory Studio stand-alone plugin x86_64 build In-Reply-To: <200706211055.28341.mateusz.kijowski@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_98768_4831674.1182417659101" References: <200706211055.28341.mateusz.kijowski@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: afc90c266be080e2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_98768_4831674.1182417659101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 6/21/07, Mateusz Kijowski wrote: > > Hi list, Hi Mateusz, I am not sure if it's the right place to ask this, but here it goes. Is > there > any particular reason why I can't install the Apache Directory Studio > stand-alone plug-ins on x86_64 eclipse through Help->Software Updates? The > error message I get is something in the lines of "architecture mismatch". > The > odd thing is that when I manualy copy the plugins to my working eclipse > install they work just fine. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll fill a Jira for this issue. Are there really any architecture dependant files in the plugins? If so, is > it > possible to have a x86_64 version built as well? If not, why can't I > install > it? > As we had a problem with the x86_64 version of the LDAP Studio RCP Application (version 0.8.0), which was running on AMD64, we tagged all the plugins as compatible for ppc and x86 only. That was a mistake since, as you said, the standalone plugins works great on x86_64 too. Thanks to Andreas Roth, one of our users on AMD64, we managed to fix the problem on that platform, and we have to release LDAP Studio 0.8.0 for AMD64. Since we need to update the downloads section to add this new version of the RCP application, we'll also change the features properties to add the x86_64 architecture as well and update the updatesite. I'll tell you when the updatesite will be uptodate, so you can test it and give us feedback. Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot ------=_Part_98768_4831674.1182417659101--