From users-return-395-apmail-directory-users-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Sat May 05 08:48:01 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23520 invoked from network); 5 May 2007 08:48:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 May 2007 08:48:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 69472 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2007 08:48:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 69447 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2007 08:48:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 69436 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2007 08:48:06 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 May 2007 01:48:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.189] (HELO mo-p07-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 May 2007 01:47:59 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (84.143.244.159) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo57) (RZmta 5.9) with ESMTP id I0064ej458SllZ for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 10:47:37 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <463C44AB.5000804@apache.org> Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 10:47:39 +0200 From: Stefan Zoerner User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: SambaXP talk References: <463A0870.8000101@symas.com> In-Reply-To: <463A0870.8000101@symas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RZG-AUTH: kR2YrGeU3i5GJZNxbYfAbITnBeX/YWiFZ/RSZNN7D9RkvGeI24ePGIBvoA== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Howard! Howard Chu wrote: > Another thing to keep in mind - unlike FedoraDS (and Sun DSEE), OpenLDAP > is fully RFC compliant, does full schema checking, and fully implements > the X.500 data model. It does all that and is still over 3 times faster. > It's not just about speed; correctness still comes first. With good > engineering you don't have to sacrifice correctness to get performance. I just wanted to note that I 100% agree with your statement about how important standard compliance is; especially in the area I work (EAI). It therefore perfectly fits that correctness was one of the primary goals ApacheDS 1.0 planned to achieve. It is difficult to measure standard compliance. Passing the LDAP certification of the Open Group http://www.opengroup.org/certification/directory-home.html was one idea we had to get feedback in this area. ApacheDS 1.0 get certified by the Open Group in Oct. 2006, and we will continue to release exclusively versions which fulfill their requirements (knowing that the tests are not complete; and therefore can't *prove* correctness). Greetings from Hamburg, Stefan ---8<--- Stefan Zoerner (szoerner@apache.org) Committer :: PMC Member Apache Directory Project http://directory.apache.org