Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58167 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2007 20:46:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2007 20:46:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 82176 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2007 20:46:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 82153 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2007 20:46:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 82142 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2007 20:46:53 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:46:53 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.218.33.218] (HELO mail.qos.ch) (85.218.33.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:46:43 -0700 Received: from kal.qos.ch (kal [192.168.1.3]) by mail.qos.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id A836C16AAB7 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:46:17 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20070321214059.04125af0@mail.qos.ch> X-Sender: blocked@mail.qos.ch (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:46:16 +0100 To: users@directory.apache.org From: Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= Subject: Re: Integration test with Apache Directory server In-Reply-To: References: <6.0.0.22.0.20070320201914.03d6f358@mail.qos.ch> <6.0.0.22.0.20070320204934.03dac310@mail.qos.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org At 11:51 AM 3/21/2007, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >Emmanuel >PS: double licenses would be a big plus for logback ;) If I start thinking about what double licensing really means, my head=20 starts to hurt. Double licensing just does not makes sense to me. For=20 instance, if license L1 forbids X but allows Y and if license L2 allows X=20 and forbids Y, are X and Y both allowed? Forbidden? Or maybe some random=20 combination? --=20 Ceki G=FClc=FC Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for= Java. http://logback.qos.ch