Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30936 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2007 21:08:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2007 21:08:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 55025 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2007 21:08:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-users-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 55000 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2007 21:08:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 54988 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2007 21:08:11 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:08:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.161] (HELO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.161) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:08:00 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p548FBFFD.dip.t-dialin.net [84.143.191.253]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo35) (RZmta 4.4) with ESMTP id E05d2aj17L6rVW for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:07:38 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <45CA3F99.70103@apache.org> Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:07:37 +0100 From: Stefan Zoerner User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: JDBC/Derby backend References: <1964cfb60702071250t365bc37u72d81363be3ffe8f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1964cfb60702071250t365bc37u72d81363be3ffe8f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RZG-AUTH: kR2YrGeU3i5GJZNxbYfA X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Juergen! Juergen Weber wrote: > Well, IBM's LDAP Server for z/OS does use DB2 as backend and it's very > fast. The same is true for this product on other platforms (IBM Tivoli Directory Server is available for Solaris, Windows, ...). A major advantage is that the LDAP server inherits some nice DB2 properties (high availabilty features, distribution) especially on AIX. > Of course you have to map hierarchical data structures to tables but > IBM showed that this is possible. ApacheDS architecture is quite flexible and allows you to extend the server with your own partition implementations. We had several questions about a JDBC or Derby partition the last months. From my point of view it would be nice to have a JDBC partition (reasonable/performant or not), for instance as an example on how to write your own partition. Unfortunately, our resources are limited (all volunteers). Currently ather things have a higher priority. But contributions are always appreciated. Perhaps you would like to share your experiences with ApacheDS on z/OS, as well. Greetings from Hamburg, Stefan ---8<--- Stefan Zoerner (szoerner@apache.org) Apache Directory Project Committer :: PMC Member