directory-kerby mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org>
Subject Re: GSSAPI branch
Date Mon, 24 Jul 2017 11:36:38 GMT
Yes I agree. I've moved trunk to "1.1.0-SNAPSHOT" + created a new branch
called "1.0.x-fixes" (which is the current trunk code, minus the recent GSS
commits).

Colm.

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zheng@intel.com> wrote:

> Merging it into trunk is fine to me. I suggest the contributor Wei answer
> your questions.
>
> Do we want to do an important release (like 1.1.0) to contain the big
> portion of codes? It looks big for the minor 1.0.1 release. I guess we may
> need longer time to make it mature.
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:coheigea@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 4:56 PM
> To: kerby@directory.apache.org
> Cc: Zhou, Wei <wei.zhou@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: GSSAPI branch
>
> Apologies, I made a mistake when merging on Friday, actually I ended up
> merging the gssapi branch to trunk, not gssapi-rebase as I thought. So the
> question is, what is missing for the current gssapi code on trunk before we
> can release it?
>
> Colm.
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <coheigea@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Just to clarify, the "gssapi-rebase" branch is the current trunk
> > branch with the fixes that were originally ported to "gssapi" applied.
> > So the "gssapi" branch can be ignored at this point. Once we are happy
> > with the code then we can merge gssapi-rebase to trunk. What is the
> "gss-v2" branch?
> >
> > Colm.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zheng@intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Colm for the moving on.
> >>
> >> I did remember we didn't attempt to merge the work into trunk is
> >> because it lacked necessary unit tests but I guess Wei had already
> >> implemented some tests? Just checked the codes just merged in, I didn't
> find them.
> >>
> >> @Wei could you help do a check? There're two branches related. It
> >> would be great if you could make sure all your gssapi related codes
> >> and tests were made in the trunk, so we can safely clean up.
> >> gss-v2;
> >> gssapi.
> >>
> >> Thanks Wei for the big contribution and look forward to making it work.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Kai
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:coheigea@apache.org]
> >> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 11:06 PM
> >> To: kerby@directory.apache.org
> >> Subject: GSSAPI branch
> >>
> >> I've created a new branch called "gssapi-rebase". I tried to rebase
> >> the gssapi branch with the trunk branch but hit a ton of merge
> >> conflicts. The gssapi-rebase branch is the current trunk branch with
> >> the original GSSAPI patches that were submitted, as well as a few other
> fixes.
> >>
> >> If there are no objections, I'll delete the gssapi branch
> >>
> >> Colm.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >>
> >> Talend Community Coder
> >> http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >
> > Talend Community Coder
> > http://coders.talend.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> Talend Community Coder
> http://coders.talend.com
>



-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message