Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-kerby-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-kerby-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA2B8187C9 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44241 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2016 00:41:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-kerby-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 44207 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2016 00:41:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kerby-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: kerby@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list kerby@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 44196 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2016 00:41:48 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E8E04C2DB8 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.022 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.022 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1zEr_IDQ6p0x for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 327E12026F for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2016 16:41:41 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,550,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="890439020" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2016 16:41:40 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.19) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:41:40 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:41:40 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.220]) by SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:41:38 +0800 From: "Li, Jiajia" To: "kerby@directory.apache.org" Subject: RE: About KdcRequest Thread-Topic: About KdcRequest Thread-Index: AdFKghrKH104eAyhTEe8v0bPWybbVgAAHfjwAGFxTKA= Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:37 +0000 Message-ID: <9037BCED616A964EB486B12FCA9DCFCF031664D3@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <8D5F7E3237B3ED47B84CF187BB17B6661485B03A@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <8D5F7E3237B3ED47B84CF187BB17B6661485B055@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <8D5F7E3237B3ED47B84CF187BB17B6661485B055@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiM2U1YmEzYjktNmZkYS00ZGQxLTlkMTYtM2M1OTEwY2UzODhmIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX1BVQkxJQyJ9XX1dfSwiU3ViamVjdExhYmVscyI6W10sIlRNQ1ZlcnNpb24iOiIxNS40LjEwLjE5IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IjQ4dkZUbkNNSzRrUGFETGNNTGZHQUVldFwvTlhxVjh5bGU5OXBLZXN2WnAwPSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_PUBLIC x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Kai, Thanks for your advises, I will try to refactor the code. Thanks Jiajia -----Original Message----- From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:kai.zheng@intel.com]=20 Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2016 10:14 AM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: RE: About KdcRequest By the way, DhClient/DhServer would be better renamed. How about DiffieHell= manClient/DiffieHellmanServer? Still, the "client/server" isn't good but an= y idea? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:kai.zheng@intel.com]=20 Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2016 10:08 AM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: About KdcRequest Hi Jiajia, I noticed the following line and related codes in KdcRequest. private DhClient dhClient; In my understanding, it should be only for PKINIT in DH case. Would you min= d refactoring the codes and moving them to the mechanism specific scope (be= tter to be in PkinitPreauth plugin). Thanks. Regards, Kai