Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-kerby-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-kerby-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 314D9185FA for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81879 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2015 00:45:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-kerby-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 81849 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2015 00:45:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kerby-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: kerby@directory.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list kerby@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 81838 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2015 00:45:16 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:45:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4B0C51A2A77 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:45:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.969 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.969 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xfUshnxzXAw3 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 27B5520EBA for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2015 16:45:08 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,319,1444719600"; d="scan'208,217";a="855128047" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2015 16:45:06 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx158.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.75) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:44:50 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by fmsmsx158.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:44:49 -0800 Received: from shsmsx152.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.193]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.42]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:44:48 +0800 From: "Zheng, Kai" To: "kerby@directory.apache.org" Subject: Categorize KrbOption by adding group info Thread-Topic: Categorize KrbOption by adding group info Thread-Index: AdEjK5Qz6ukvxrLFTDmUpGCBgim/Qg== Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:44:48 +0000 Message-ID: <8D5F7E3237B3ED47B84CF187BB17B66611CC8733@SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8D5F7E3237B3ED47B84CF187BB17B66611CC8733SHSMSX152ccrcor_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_8D5F7E3237B3ED47B84CF187BB17B66611CC8733SHSMSX152ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Steve, Ref. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-458 you're going to add a= bout 15 KDC flags into KrbOption. As we discussed it sounds reasonable. Now= here I'm considering it may be good to categorize them or easily identify = them as 'kdc flags', thus it would be much elegant to pick them up and tran= sform them to KdcRequest. How about adding a 'group' field to the KrbOption= enum? It could be done while you make the changes or we can do it separate= ly. Thanks. Also welcome any others' feedback. Thanks. Regards, Kai --_000_8D5F7E3237B3ED47B84CF187BB17B66611CC8733SHSMSX152ccrcor_--