Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D6E200CFA for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:07:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E095D163318; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 30D02163317 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:07:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 208 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2017 11:07:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 198 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2017 11:07:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:07:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4BA4B18219D for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:07:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CJ60cwzacfm for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id CE9D75FB9F for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5A8FFE087D for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 143512414B for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:07:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kai Zheng (JIRA)" To: dev@directory.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-651) Add support to send a JWT AccessToken via the GSS API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:07:09 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16153480#comment-16153480 ] Kai Zheng commented on DIRKRB-651: ---------------------------------- bq. why should we maintain two separate constructors when both are private and wouldn't be used outside the class anyway? Ok, as it's private and wouldn't be used outside, modifying it shouldn't be concerned. Agree with your point. > Add support to send a JWT AccessToken via the GSS API > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DIRKRB-651 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-651 > Project: Directory Kerberos > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Colm O hEigeartaigh > Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > Attachments: DIRKRB-651.patch > > > This task is to add support to send a JWT AccessToken via the GSS API. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)