directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Burch <br...@pingtoo.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache DS 2.0.0-M24 release
Date Tue, 06 Jun 2017 07:29:38 GMT
On 06/06/17 16:10, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> 
>> The two disks are identical and configured as a linux soft RAID array.
>> They are Hitachi HDS721010CLA332s - 1 Tb 7200 rpm.
> 
> I'm sure that's the cause. I also tried to build ApacheDS on a server
> with spinning disks, and it takes forever. I assume that we just do too
> many sync's when writing data to disk during the tests.
> 
> @Emmanuel: Is it possible to disable sync-on-write?
>

I seem to remember my "solution" was to implement some rather nasty 
synchronized static semaphores with finalizers to allow each of the 
several threads within a single test unit to follow each-other's 
progress. I also had to configure jUnit to only run one test unit at a 
time (to protect the statics). It was tricky and ugly, but I was 
desperate to have every test always run properly on any platform. I 
presume this is a surefire problem, not apacheds?

>> To make matters more depressing, I decided to do a clean checkout of M24
>> on my laptop, which is super-slow by comparison. That failed much
>> earlier (goal apacheds-core-api - missing dependencies) and I will post
>> those details separately when I get back home again in a couple of hours
>> from now.
> 
> That's probably another reason: The API 1.0.0 which ApacheDS M24 depends
> on is not yet available in public Maven repo. On your other machine you
> built it yourself and thus it's in you local maven repo.

You are correct! I copied my local API sandbox to the laptop and then 
re-ran mvn clean. It now fails in exactly the same way as my desktop, i.e.

[INFO] Apache Directory API All ........................... SUCCESS [ 
8.239 s]
[INFO] Apache Directory LDAP API Client All ............... SUCCESS [ 
6.523 s]
[INFO] Apache Directory API Integration Tests ............. SUCCESS [ 
33.313 s]
[INFO] Apache Directory API OSGi Integration Tests ........ FAILURE [ 
59.170 s]
[INFO] Apache Directory API OSGi Integration Tests 2 ...... SKIPPED
[INFO] Apache Directory LDAP API Distribution ............. SKIPPED
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 05:57 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2017-06-06T17:12:59+10:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 49M/405M
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.19.1:test 
(default-test) on project api-integ-osgi: Execution default-test of goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.19.1:test failed: The 
forked VM terminated without properly saying goodbye. VM crash or 
System.exit called?
[ERROR] Command was /bin/sh -c cd 
/home/brian/sandboxApache/ldap-api-1.0.0/integ-osgi && 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java -Xmx1024m -jar 
/home/brian/sandboxApache/ldap-api-1.0.0/integ-osgi/target/surefire/surefirebooter7386057830129872783.jar

/home/brian/sandboxApache/ldap-api-1.0.0/integ-osgi/target/surefire/surefire806017378512191980tmp

/home/brian/sandboxApache/ldap-api-1.0.0/integ-osgi/target/surefire/surefire_157233883319047368199tmp


>> (It isn't too late to fire me from the developers team!! I wanted to
>> help, but it doesn't look like I am yet!)
> 
> Don't be depressed, your feedback is very helpful! It shows that our
> software is too big and the build is too complex etc. (but I don't know
> how to improve and too less time...)

Perhaps you can't change it at the moment, but don't you think it is 
"wrong" that the directory build doesn't include the API?

I think it is excellent that the API can be built stand-alone. (I might 
even consider converting some old applications which still use a private 
copy of the final Netscape LDAP API, along with a LOT of my own 
modifications, which work well against apacheds M23).

On the other hand, it seems strange that the directory build, which 
depends heavily on the API, doesn't build its own copy if one isn't 
already available...

> Kind Regards,
> Stefan

Thanks very much for your encouragement. I'll do my best to be 
constructive with my observations.

Brian


Mime
View raw message