directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Zheng, Kai" <kai.zh...@intel.com>
Subject RE: Scim library contribution
Date Sat, 14 May 2016 14:47:47 GMT
Yeah, before it becomes a TLP, there should be something to be done and happen. One thing is,
have a separate web site. I discussed about this with an Apache officer and was told it was
doable. There can be found quite a few examples, sub project can have standalone web site.

To evolve, we shouldn't keep all things together, to make the parent web site crowded and
crowded.

Glad to have a new component from PSU!

Regards,
Kai

-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn McKinney [mailto:smckinney@apache.org] 
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 7:16 AM
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Scim library contribution


> On May 13, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The rational here is to make sure that we have some common interest in 
> having those projects and the associated people working hand in hand, 
> to create a strong community.

It has been immensely valuable to have the guidance of this project committee.  It brings
extra eyes to our code and processes.

> 
> On May 13, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Fortress was also benefiting from ApacheDS, as all the unit tests are 
> based on it. Now that a 1.0 is out, we can also think about making it 
> a TLP. That would be up to Shawn and Chris to see when it would make 
> sense, but the community around it is small atm.

Agreed.  The community must grow before TLP status makes sense.  Otherwise I guess you’re
stuck with us cause we’re not giving up anytime soon.   ;-)

Shawn
Mime
View raw message