Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C825181DB for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74008 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2015 08:46:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 73947 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2015 08:46:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 73936 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2015 08:46:05 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:46:05 +0000 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:46:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kiran Ayyagari (JIRA)" To: dev@directory.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2104) Renaming an entry which uses a SINGLE-VALUE attribute in the RDN fails MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14952820#comment-14952820 ] Kiran Ayyagari commented on DIRSERVER-2104: ------------------------------------------- bq. I see no reason why we should reject the operation, I think we should go for the first option. That is not really intuitive for a user who has directed the server _not_ to delete, I prefer the operation to fail explicitly rather than dropping the old RDN to user's surprise. > Renaming an entry which uses a SINGLE-VALUE attribute in the RDN fails > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DIRSERVER-2104 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2104 > Project: Directory ApacheDS > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M20 > Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny > Fix For: 2.0.0-M21 > > > There is a test ({{LdifPartitionTest.testLdifRenameAndRetainOldDN}}) that does a rename, trying to keep the old RDN present : > {code} > Rdn newRdn = new Rdn( "dc=renamedChild1" ); > RenameOperationContext renameOpCtx = new RenameOperationContext( session, childDn1, newRdn, false ); > partition.rename( renameOpCtx ); > ... > // the renamed LDIF must contain the old an new Rdn attribute > String content = FileUtils.readFileToString( new File( wkdir, "ou=test,ou=system/dc=renamedchild1.ldif" ) ); > assertTrue( content.contains( "dc: child1" ) ); > assertTrue( content.contains( "dc: renamedchild1" ) ); > {code} > The past passes green which is really problematic : the {{DC}} AttributeType is supposed to be SINGLE-VALUE !!! > {code} > attributetype ( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.25 NAME ( 'dc' 'domainComponent' ) > DESC 'RFC1274/2247: domain component' > EQUALITY caseIgnoreIA5Match > SUBSTR caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch > SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 > SINGLE-VALUE > USAGE userApplications > ) > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)