directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 389 Directory Server support in API
Date Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:39:03 GMT
Le 14/07/15 12:54, Ludovic Poitou a écrit :
> From: Emmanuel Lécharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
> Reply: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>>
> Date: 14 Jul 2015 at 11:39:13
> To: dev@directory.apache.org <dev@directory.apache.org>>
> Subject:  Re: 389 Directory Server support in API  
>
> Le 14/07/15 10:49, Radovan Semancik a écrit :  
>> Hi,  
>>  
>> In rev.1690876 I've committed a couple of changes to support 389ds in  
>> API.  
>>  
>> Firstly is looks like 389ds does not respond to base search of root  
>> DSE unless the attributes are specified explicitly (* or + does not  
>> work). So I've added support for this.  
> Good to know. 389ds is known to be a crappy LDAP server, this is one  
> more proof...  
>
>
> Actually, it is compliant with the LDAP RFC.
> The attributes in the root DSE are operational, thus must be requested explicitly. ‘*’
only applies to regular attributes.
> ‘+’ is defined in an extension RFC (3673) but not part of the LDAPv3 standards series
(RFC4510).

Damn, you are right... My bad :/


Mime
View raw message