Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: message received from 54.76.25.247 which
 is an MX secondary for dev@directory.apache.org)
Message-ID: <5539F809.6030606@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:00:09 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?RW1tYW51ZWwgTMOpY2hhcm55?= <elecharny@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: new mailing lists ?
References: <55390930.6080409@gmail.com> <5539DD78.9010006@stefan-seelmann.de>
In-Reply-To: <5539DD78.9010006@stefan-seelmann.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Le 24/04/15 08:06, Stefan Seelmann a écrit :
> On 04/23/2015 05:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
>> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
>> like those mailing list would be good to have :
>> - studio-dev
>> - kerby-dev
>> - fortress-dev
>>
>> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
> +1 for Kerby, there is very much activity
>
> +0 for Fortress, I think it is still connected to the rest, it also
> depends on LDAP API and uses ApacheDS libs.

There is already a fortress ML, which is targetting users and dev. We
can move all fortress mails to this existing ML, no urgent need for a
fortress-dev atm.

>
> I don't think we need it for Studio, there has already been more
> activity in the past.

Ok.

Kiran, I don't think we need a formal vote to create a kerby ML. Should
we consider that this is the only ML we need atm ?