directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Zheng, Kai" <kai.zh...@intel.com>
Subject RE: new mailing lists ?
Date Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:22:54 GMT
>> I don't think we need a vote, and yes a ML for Kerby is all we need now.
Thank you all for the good consideration, it would be helpful a lot!

Regards,
Kai

From: Kiran Ayyagari [mailto:kayyagari@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 4:11 PM
To: Apache Directory Developers List
Subject: Re: new mailing lists ?



On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecharny@gmail.com<mailto:elecharny@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Le 24/04/15 08:06, Stefan Seelmann a écrit :
> On 04/23/2015 05:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not
>> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems
>> like those mailing list would be good to have :
>> - studio-dev
>> - kerby-dev
>> - fortress-dev
>>
>> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ?
> +1 for Kerby, there is very much activity
>
> +0 for Fortress, I think it is still connected to the rest, it also
> depends on LDAP API and uses ApacheDS libs.

There is already a fortress ML, which is targetting users and dev. We
can move all fortress mails to this existing ML, no urgent need for a
fortress-dev atm.

>
> I don't think we need it for Studio, there has already been more
> activity in the past.

Ok.

Kiran, I don't think we need a formal vote to create a kerby ML. Should
we consider that this is the only ML we need atm ?
I don't think we need a vote, and yes a ML for Kerby is all we need now.


--
Kiran Ayyagari
http://keydap.com
Mime
View raw message