Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2E5210BBC for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89942 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2015 11:27:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 89892 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2015 11:27:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 89872 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2015 11:27:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 11:27:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mail@stefan-seelmann.de designates 109.239.48.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [109.239.48.183] (HELO amber.s12n.de) (109.239.48.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 11:27:08 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.100] (aftr-88-217-181-169.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.169]) by amber.s12n.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE0532FE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 12:26:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54ABC636.6090502@stefan-seelmann.de> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 12:25:42 +0100 From: Stefan Seelmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1649544 - /directory/apacheds/trunk/pom.xml References: <20150105151556.5CA01AC0143@hades.apache.org> <54AACE6E.9010009@stefan-seelmann.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at amber X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Seems I didn't remember correctly: When using pax-exam 4.4.0 it is not possible to build using JDK 6. However it is posssible to build using JDK 7 *and* to create Java6 compliant class files (what we do with maven-compiler-plugin setting). And I think each developer uses at least JDK 7 anyway, right? The only risk is that we use some class/method not available in Java6, but that is independent from pax-exam version. So I think we can keep pax-exam 4.4.0. Sorry for the confusion. Kind Regards, Stefan On 01/06/2015 11:04 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > I guess it's not such a good idea to impose a minimum JDK version on a > minor release. I will revert the pax exam change unless someone thinks it > should stay? > > Colm. > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Stefan Seelmann > wrote: > >> On 01/05/2015 04:15 PM, coheigea@apache.org wrote: >>> - 3.5.0 >>> - 2.2.0 >>> + 4.4.0 >>> + 2.3.0 >> >> When using pax-exam 4.4.0 we need to set compiler level of our projects >> to Java 1.7 otherwise the OSGi tests will fail. I'm ok with increasing >> the compiler level, but maybe some users still stick to 1.6? >> >> Kind Regards, >> Stefan >> >> > >