directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Seelmann <m...@stefan-seelmann.de>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1649544 - /directory/apacheds/trunk/pom.xml
Date Tue, 06 Jan 2015 11:25:42 GMT
Seems I didn't remember correctly:

When using pax-exam 4.4.0 it is not possible to build using JDK 6.

However it is posssible to build using JDK 7 *and* to create Java6
compliant class files (what we do with maven-compiler-plugin setting).
And I think each developer uses at least JDK 7 anyway, right? The only
risk is that we use some class/method not available in Java6, but that
is independent from pax-exam version.

So I think we can keep pax-exam 4.4.0.

Sorry for the confusion.

Kind Regards,
Stefan


On 01/06/2015 11:04 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> I guess it's not such a good idea to impose a minimum JDK version on a
> minor release. I will revert the pax exam change unless someone thinks it
> should stay?
> 
> Colm.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Stefan Seelmann <mail@stefan-seelmann.de>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 01/05/2015 04:15 PM, coheigea@apache.org wrote:
>>> -    <pax-exam.version>3.5.0</pax-exam.version>
>>> -    <pax-url.version>2.2.0</pax-url.version>
>>> +    <pax-exam.version>4.4.0</pax-exam.version>
>>> +    <pax-url.version>2.3.0</pax-url.version>
>>
>> When using pax-exam 4.4.0 we need to set compiler level of our projects
>> to Java 1.7 otherwise the OSGi tests will fail. I'm ok with increasing
>> the compiler level, but maybe some users still stick to 1.6?
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Stefan
>>
>>
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message